Started By
Message

re: D'Angelo Russell on Sports Science

Posted on 6/26/15 at 6:31 pm to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83814 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 6:31 pm to
Just think he'll underwhelm. And that doesn't mean he won't be good. Just that he'll underwhelm as far as what his hype has become.

Seen him compared to Steph everywhere. I don't think a single aspect of his game is on that level. And I think Steph needs every bit of every aspect of his game to be on point to be as successful as he is.

I see Russell as a poor man's Steph and I don't think a poor man's Steph would be all that great.

I have absolutely zero experience or credibility evaluating players btw. And everyone here will tell you that That's just what I think of his game. Think he's overhyped. That's all.
This post was edited on 6/26/15 at 6:33 pm
Posted by VA LSU fan
Virginia
Member since Dec 2007
7919 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:04 pm to
I'm not replying to you more the people comparing him to Curry.

Comparing him to Curry is dumb. He's a better athlete and better floor general. Better rebounder and as good or better ball distributor. That said he will never be the shooter curry is but could be an elite scorer. A better comparison would be Westbrook.

His Stat line as a freshman could be his year two stating in the NBA. I think LA needs to prioritize Love as the desired free agent to clear the middle for Randle and Russell.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram