Started By
Message

re: How pretentious is the word "foodie"?

Posted on 6/18/15 at 8:37 am to
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
39188 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 8:37 am to
I made up the specific complaint, I was trying to make the point that self identified foodies always seem to be the first ones to point out the negatives about the experience. Like if everyone had razor sharp senses like theirs we'd all see the deficiency. Foodie = amateur critic that no one wants to hear from.
Posted by BlackenedOut
The Big Sleazy
Member since Feb 2011
5827 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 8:39 am to
I can see that point to an extent. But then again I think many people romanticize (and watch) say a Bourdain show where he is in Naples/Provence/Tokyo and sitting around with some locals who are arguing who makes the best and proper ________.

Talking about food is just as enjoyable, sometimes, as eating it.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32946 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 9:01 am to
quote:

I made up the specific complaint, I was trying to make the point that self identified foodies always seem to be the first ones to point out the negatives about the experience. Like if everyone had razor sharp senses like theirs we'd all see the deficiency. Foodie = amateur critic that no one wants to hear from


I can definitely see this. I have a couple friends who complain about every meal that they eat. Either something wasn't cooked the way they wanted or if nothing was wrong with the food they'll complain that it was "pricey". It's really annoying, it feels like they go out of their way to not enjoy a meal.

Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 6/18/15 at 9:50 am to
quote:

I made up the specific complaint, I was trying to make the point that self identified foodies always seem to be the first ones to point out the negatives about the experience. Like if everyone had razor sharp senses like theirs we'd all see the deficiency. Foodie = amateur critic that no one wants to hear from.


I was reading a book last week about class and the author referenced a really good article from a few years back that very succinctly summed up the psychology behind the "foodie" persona that some people specifically try to project.

quote:

Foodism has taken on the sociological characteristics of what used to be known—in the days of the rising postwar middle class, when Mortimer Adler was peddling the Great Books and Leonard Bernstein was on television—as culture. It is costly. It requires knowledge and connoisseurship, which are themselves costly to develop. It is a badge of membership in the higher classes, an ideal example of what Thorstein Veblen, the great social critic of the Gilded Age, called conspicuous consumption. It is a vehicle of status aspiration and competition, an ever-present occasion for snobbery, one-upmanship and social aggression. (My farmers’ market has bigger, better, fresher tomatoes than yours.) Nobody cares if you know about Mozart or Leonardo anymore, but you had better be able to discuss the difference between ganache and couverture.”


William Deresiewicz, “A Matter of Taste?” New York Times, October 26, 2012
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram