Started By
Message

re: Mad Men Series Finale - "Person to Person"

Posted on 5/20/15 at 3:07 pm to
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22548 posts
Posted on 5/20/15 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Well it's open to interpretation


That doesnt mean both interpretations are correct
Posted by MikeyFL
Las Vegas, NV
Member since Sep 2010
9623 posts
Posted on 5/20/15 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

That doesnt mean both interpretations are correct



For a long time, critics believed that the "author's intention" was the correct interpretation of a work. However, that belief has come under fire in recent years as works of art, music, literature, and film cross cultural boundaries and live for centuries. When those things happen, art is naturally reinterpreted in different ways by different audiences.

Also, we know that authors and composers lie about their own work (e.g., Igor Stravinsky) to obscure the original intent

Thus, the idea of a single "correct" interpretation, as one might find in science, simply doesn't exist. Some interpretations are founded on more concrete evidence than others. Hence, they might be more persuasive to a given audience in a given time period.

For some, this is what makes art frustrating. For others (like me), this is what makes art exciting and alive.
This post was edited on 5/20/15 at 3:39 pm
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
11861 posts
Posted on 5/20/15 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

That doesnt mean both interpretations are correct



Ok genius.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram