- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: La'el Collins reportedly signing with Cowboys
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:20 pm to OldManRiver
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:20 pm to OldManRiver
quote:
OldManRiver
You hit the nail on the head with a previous post, then you go off on a tangent.
0
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:20 pm to DBU
Here is my question, if BRPD had anything on him, why would they reiterate that he is not a suspect? Wouldn't they simply say they will not comment on an ongoing investigation? Seems foolish to say he still isn't a suspect if there was ANY inkling of foul play on his part.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:20 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Yeah, I don't need to know this stuff THAT bad. I can just wait until something official comes out. Anything else is pretty much gossip.
It's no different than the "insiders" posting during the defensive coordinator search
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:21 pm to absolute692
Dude either spill what you know or don't say anything. Posting to an open forum in "I know something you don't know" fashion comes off incredibly childish. If you had no intention of giving up your source or the information, why post it at all.
It'd be like hypothetically if Brandon Harris failed a drug test and a somebody in the program told me about it. The I came here and posted, "Brandon Harris may have a situation. And no I won't tell you anymore." Either keep it to yourself or spill. Otherwise it comes off as incredibly attention whorish.
It'd be like hypothetically if Brandon Harris failed a drug test and a somebody in the program told me about it. The I came here and posted, "Brandon Harris may have a situation. And no I won't tell you anymore." Either keep it to yourself or spill. Otherwise it comes off as incredibly attention whorish.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:21 pm to touchdownjeebus
quote:Um... actually, it's smart.
if BRPD had anything on him, why would they reiterate that he is not a suspect? Wouldn't they simply say they will not comment on an ongoing investigation? Seems foolish to say he still isn't a suspect if there was ANY inkling of foul play on his part.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:21 pm to Mattwells90
quote:
Seems rather silly to me when posters spread that they have info in a thread but refuse to give any details unless you email them.
I am not having people email to give them details.
I have ignored several emails because it's just people wanting info.
I have answered people that have asked direct questions regarding the situation.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:22 pm to Mattwells90
He implied his source is someone affiliated with BRPD.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:23 pm to civiltiger07
Maybe they should look at Absolute.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:23 pm to GeauxToBed
quote:So he'll either be questioned for inside info on the murder or a new corruption charge! Nice.
He implied his source is someone affiliated with BRPD.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:23 pm to themunch
quote:
Maybe they should look at Absolute.
absolute isn't a suspect man.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:24 pm to Chad504boy
Maybe he should be.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:24 pm to GeauxToBed
It may be. But if you aren't intending on telling whats going on, why post at all?
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:24 pm to ell_13
How is it smart to say someone is not a suspect if they are in fact a suspect? Never have I heard of authorities doing this, never. They will say no comment, but not reiterate someone's innocence.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:24 pm to themunch
quote:
aybe he should be.
i guess he better hire the best attorney money can buy and delay a week.
This post was edited on 5/4/15 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:25 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:26 pm to absolute692
Please ban this idiot. It's gone too far.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:26 pm to touchdownjeebus
quote:They haven't done either... "He is not a suspect at this time" isn't definitive at all. And that's the point. I've posted 3 times now that police departments don't call out suspects anymore if they don't have to. For a multitude of reasons.
How is it smart to say someone is not a suspect if they are in fact a suspect? Never have I heard of authorities doing this, never. They will say no comment, but not reiterate someone's innocence.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:26 pm to touchdownjeebus
Agreed. You always get the "it's an ongoing investigation" line. Never, he is not a suspect.
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:27 pm to touchdownjeebus
quote:
They will say no comment, but not reiterate someone's innocence.
Have the police officially stated he isnt a suspect?
Posted on 5/4/15 at 3:27 pm to GeauxToBed
quote:
He implied his source is someone affiliated with BRPD.
I did not.
But obviously someone within the BRPD provided this information to the source. Or it is completely fabricated.
Page 34 of 65
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News