- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So maybe the trade wasn't about Jimmy
Posted on 3/11/15 at 11:39 am to TigerB8
Posted on 3/11/15 at 11:39 am to TigerB8
quote:
Ian Rapoport ?@RapSheet 3m3 minutes ago Interesting… In initial talks, @Alex_Flanagan said #Saints GM Mickey Loomis threw out some WRs to Seattle for potential trades. Wonder who
I'm guessing Colston and/or Toon, which Seattle probably laughed at both. I would have a hard time seeing them include Cooks or Stills.
This post was edited on 3/11/15 at 11:41 am
2
Posted on 3/11/15 at 11:47 am to mm2316
Well this kinda defuses the "Saints vs Graham" rift theory.
Just shows the change in philosophy to valuing power over finesse on the offensive side. And the need to protect Brees.
Just shows the change in philosophy to valuing power over finesse on the offensive side. And the need to protect Brees.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:27 pm to mm2316
quote:
I'm guessing Colston and/or Toon, which Seattle probably laughed at both. I would have a hard time seeing them include Cooks or Stills.
I wouldn't be so sure of that, you don't jump from Colston/Toon to Graham. It wouldn't surprise me if Cooks or Stills was initially offered.
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 1:22 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News