And if the roles were reversed would people be in here discounting LSU's performance by saying that Tenn. lost the game? Hell no, everyone would be in here talking about how great LSU was last night. I guess LSU didn't really do anything to really "win" the first game, UT simply just "lost" it by their poor play.

Tenn. WON THE GAME because they out-hustled, out-coached, out-executed, out-everythinged LSU.

It was an arse KICKING because LSU played with no effort and executed horribly on both sides of the ball.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Howyouluhdat

On Fleek St

Member since Jan 2015

7560 posts

Posted on 3/5/15 at 11:39 am to Alt26

quote:
nd if the roles were reversed would people be in here discounting LSU's performance by saying that Tenn. lost the game? Hell no, everyone would be in here talking about how great LSU was last night.

No because LSU is the better team. When you get your arse whooped by a bad Tenn team at home with the product we put on the floor last night you damn right we lost that game because of horrible play on both sides of the ball. It's your job with everything on the line at the PMAC in your last home game to not let Tenn do what they did. So to answer your question no nobody would say Tenn played bad because they are bad!

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by TeamLSU

Member since Feb 2009

3111 posts

Posted on 3/5/15 at 12:43 pm to Alt26

Alt26-I think you are missing the point. LSU lost the game because of LACK of hustle, intensity, effort and FUNDAMENTALS. While Tenn. won on the scoreboard, they had a great deal of help from LSU. This game wasn't about what Tenn did, it was all about what LSU didn't do. Plain and simple.

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board