Started By
Message

re: Experience with Ultrasound Findings?

Posted on 2/26/15 at 12:39 pm to
Posted by CurDog
Member since Jan 2007
28083 posts
Posted on 2/26/15 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

And your daughter is a healthy girl at 3?


healthy and a wild child

quote:

Ours was found to be just an isolated intracardiac focus.


same

obviously this needs to be looked at frequently , but (if memory serves me) they are small calcium deposits, that typically go away in the 3rd trimester
Posted by HoustonTiger2008
Member since Feb 2015
631 posts
Posted on 2/26/15 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

healthy and a wild child

Very glad to hear that.

quote:

obviously this needs to be looked at frequently

Our OB actually told us they don't even bother looking at it anymore. She said it might go away before birth, might not, but structurally won't effect anything. They just call it a "soft" marker for genetic abnormalities which is what has been worrisome for us. They said the chances of anything being wrong is very very low as my wife is younger than 30 years old.

I appreciate you talking about it. Trying to put my mind at ease.
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
6962 posts
Posted on 2/26/15 at 12:50 pm to
Where?

I just posted today in the if you've lost a child thread, but someone very close to me found out at 20 weeks that her baby had no brain or kidneys.

I am not sure of the echogenic focus, but I know there was a level two ultra sound that gave a more detailed understanding of how serious the condition was.

She made the brave decision to terminate at 23 weeks since there was no chance for her baby.

But she has gone on to have two healthy beautiful kids.

There are a lot of prenatal tests available that can give you peace of mind if you ask your doctor.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram