- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred "Open" to Eliminating Defensive Shifts
Posted on 1/26/15 at 12:24 pm to piggidyphish
Posted on 1/26/15 at 12:24 pm to piggidyphish
I don't think any baseball fan on the planet would stop watching baseball because they banned defensive shifts. And it would inject offense into the game. If you think about EVERYTHING from a commissioner or executive point of view, it makes more sense to me.
Football and basketball are adjusting their rules and innovating. Baseball isn't. Football and basketball are the two most popular sports in America and are only growing in popularity. I see a correlation.
Football and basketball are adjusting their rules and innovating. Baseball isn't. Football and basketball are the two most popular sports in America and are only growing in popularity. I see a correlation.
Posted on 1/26/15 at 12:53 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
I don't think any baseball fan on the planet would stop watching baseball because they banned defensive shifts. And it would inject offense into the game. If you think about EVERYTHING from a commissioner or executive point of view, it makes more sense to me.
Football and basketball are adjusting their rules and innovating. Baseball isn't. Football and basketball are the two most popular sports in America and are only growing in popularity. I see a correlation.
No...no one would stop watching. But there are better ways to improve it. I also think the game will adjust itself and thus cause pause to any manager who thinks of shifting. I can't speak for a league wide adjustment, but for my team our slugger started laying (and threatening to do so) bunts down the 3rd base line. The shifts on him changed after he showed he could do it. I see no reason why that won't become more common.
Posted on 1/26/15 at 4:46 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Shifts are a contributor, but not a big one. BIS estimated the number of runs saved via shifting in 2014 at 195 runs across the majors -- or 6.5 runs per team, on average, over the entire season.
The average team scored 659 runs in 2014. Ten years ago in 2004, the average team scored 779 runs. So those 6.5 runs explain just 5 percent of the decline in offense over the past 10 years.
Posted on 1/26/15 at 5:34 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
I don't think any baseball fan on the planet would stop watching baseball because they banned defensive shifts. And it would inject offense into the game. If you think about EVERYTHING from a commissioner or executive point of view, it makes more sense to me.
Football and basketball are adjusting their rules and innovating. Baseball isn't. Football and basketball are the two most popular sports in America and are only growing in popularity. I see a correlation.
This isn't football or basketball.. and that is what separates this sport from those with more rules.
I happen to like stats like ERA.. and enjoy the defensive aspect of baseball. Want more runs? Then let the players juice up and hit bombs.. but don't take the ideas behind defensive schemes in baseball from me. I like the chess match going on. I this it's BS to no allow you to align your defense according to a player's tendencies.. That defeats the entire principle behind baseball.
This is so silly.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)