- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2013 Offense - Similar to what 2003/2004 USC Would do in SEC?
Posted on 12/23/14 at 7:21 pm to Powerman
Posted on 12/23/14 at 7:21 pm to Powerman
As I recall, offense wasn't the issue people had with 2003 USC playing in the SEC. It was their defense that people felt would have had them in the middle of the pack.
Posted on 12/23/14 at 7:25 pm to Godfather1
quote:
As I recall, offense wasn't the issue people had with 2003 USC playing in the SEC. It was their defense that people felt would have had them in the middle of the pack.
Which was even more fricking dumb. Pete Carroll has shown he is a defensive genius.
Plus, here is the talent from 03/04 USC defenses:
Kenechi Udeze
Shaun cody
Sedrick Ellis
Matt Grootegoed
Lofa Tatupu
Darnell Bing
Frostee Rucker
The way Mauck was playing towards the end of the year, LSU is really fricking lucky that we got matched against OU instead of USC.
I think USC was a bad matchup for us. Leinart adn Chow's quick west coast offense would've taken away the Dline advantage we had and would've exposed our weaker points like linebackers against TEs and LBers against RBs in the passing game.
Maybe Leinart freaks against the rush and has a bad game, but I truly believe USC would've won that game. (Not that they deserved the title shot)
This post was edited on 12/23/14 at 7:31 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News