- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would you trade a 3rd round pick for Cordarralle Patterson?
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:39 am
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:39 am
quote:
#Vikings offense snap count: WR Charles Johnson played 47/48 snaps. Cordarrelle Patterson had 3 snaps. f
OR evEn a late 2?
Quickly falling out of favor with Minnesota if you've been following the situation. We could use his skill set as a gamebreaker + return man.
Colston
Cordarralle
Cooks
Stills
Toon
Morgan
MAKE it happen lommis
DRIVEMAN OUT
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:41 am to death valley driver
No.
ETA: Our receiving corps isn't the problem. And from what I've read, he isn't a good route runner and can't get open. So we'd be getting a big play receiver that can't run the entire route tree. We currently have two big play receivers with Stills and Morgan, why do we need a third? Just for KO returns?
ETA: Our receiving corps isn't the problem. And from what I've read, he isn't a good route runner and can't get open. So we'd be getting a big play receiver that can't run the entire route tree. We currently have two big play receivers with Stills and Morgan, why do we need a third? Just for KO returns?
This post was edited on 12/1/14 at 9:52 am
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:41 am to death valley driver
Probably. But I really just think we have a nice future with Stills and Cooks and God damn put morgan on the field.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:44 am to death valley driver
Absolutely.
And I haven't been following...he thuggin it up or something?
And I haven't been following...he thuggin it up or something?
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:46 am to death valley driver
Depending on what the issue is in Minnesota, I'd do a 2nd, especially if we make the playoffs and our pick is later in the round.
This post was edited on 12/1/14 at 9:47 am
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:47 am to death valley driver
No. In the third we could find a o-linemen or linebacker
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:51 am to death valley driver
If we make the playoffs, I'd be amenable. But if we drop 1-3 of these next 4 and miss, get a pick in the mid round area, I wouldn't be.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:54 am to boom roasted
quote:
No.
ETA: Our receiving corps isn't the problem. And from what I've read, he isn't a good route runner and can't get open. So we'd be getting a big play receiver that can't run the entire route tree. We currently have two big play receivers with Stills and Morgan, why do we need a third? Just for KO returns?
Disagree completely.
Patterson is a significant cut above both of the players you mentioned. If you could get him for a 3rd, I'd do it in a heartbeat.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:55 am to boom roasted
quote:
And from what I've read, he isn't a good route runner and can't get open. So we'd be getting a big play receiver that can't run the entire route tree. We currently have two big play receivers with Stills and Morgan, why do we need a third? Just for KO returns?
He's 23 yo and 6'2" 220 athletic freak with blazing speed. You're banking on him, ya know, improving under our coaching staff and becoming a legit #1 receiver
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:56 am to moneyg
His #s say otherwise although he doesn't have an aging no good Drew back there
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:57 am to death valley driver
A third? That's tough. There's real quality in the third round of the draft.
I'd give them a 5th though, but I'm just an armchair GM.
I'd give them a 5th though, but I'm just an armchair GM.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 9:58 am to death valley driver
Getting a little saltay.
He is a big athletic freak that can't get open. It seems that he actually regressed coming into year two. The hope coming into year two was that he would improve his route running and actually become a legit NFL receiver. It appears he didn't do that. His coach publicly called him out on it.
Pardon me if I don't think we should use draft picks on another receiver.
He is a big athletic freak that can't get open. It seems that he actually regressed coming into year two. The hope coming into year two was that he would improve his route running and actually become a legit NFL receiver. It appears he didn't do that. His coach publicly called him out on it.
Pardon me if I don't think we should use draft picks on another receiver.
This post was edited on 12/1/14 at 10:11 am
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:06 am to death valley driver
Nope, he is dumb as a rock. Have you ever heard him speak? Sounds like a 3rd grader.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:16 am to Zoombop
Spin off...... why dont we have Morgan returning punts and kickoffs?
Who is returning punts? I dont even know
Who is returning punts? I dont even know
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:19 am to death valley driver
No. I'm sick of the Saints giving up mid round picks, we need every pick we can get for this upcoming draft. Last I looked at it, the Saints were picking 10th and if he somehow fell to us, I'd much prefer Amari Cooper right there.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:20 am to Zoombop
LOL because football knowledge is the same as real world knowledge. I am pretty sure a ton of athletes are the sharpest tools in the shed but know way more then you about you know...football.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:20 am to death valley driver
quote:
3rd round pick for Cordarralle Patterson?
30 Catches
62 Targets
350 Yards
11.7 YPC
1 TD
3rd Rounder...No.
Nice measurables though.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:23 am to LSUSkip
quote:
why dont we have Morgan returning punts and kickoffs?
Damn good question...Cadet is ok but an upgrade at that position would change games
Morgan definitely deserves a shot IMO he could truly excel as a returner.
Posted on 12/1/14 at 10:23 am to partywiththelombardi
Patterson is a freak and would put up good numbers in this offense. Good returning ability and a better WR than Morgan and Toon.
not saying we should do it, but don't underrate pattersons skills
not saying we should do it, but don't underrate pattersons skills
This post was edited on 12/1/14 at 10:44 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News