- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where has that offense been?
Posted on 11/28/14 at 11:15 am to damnedoldtigah
Posted on 11/28/14 at 11:15 am to damnedoldtigah
I don't think anyone is calling this a "memorable win" or anything. But it was encouraging and refreshing to see us try new stuff on offense by getting our playmakers in space and still sticking to our identity of ramming it down people's throats. And we won. At this juncture I don't know what else to ask for. Obviously we still have a lot of work to do for the bowl game and in the offseason.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 11:18 am to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
It took a lot of bad plays and tough losses to get us to that point (i.e., the point of trying new wrinkles in the offense). But at least we got there last night. Hopefully, we'll carry over some of that creativity into next season.
this^
most predicted lsu 8-4, some thought 4-8,=.
mostly a NEW frosh heavy (read high school) team.
if the ol stays, we goin' to the ship.
but, if ol goes pro, we are still rebuildin'.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 11:48 am to Choupique19
quote:
It's not a "new offense". We simply ran a couple of plays that we hadn't run before. As others have pointed out, we have run the read options many times this year.
was a lot more to it than just 'running the read option'. Also lined up in shotgun and pistol quite a bit. Also single back formations and two backs but not in an I. Tons of misdirection, passes on non mandantory passing downs (and a lot of variety in the pass game). The main thing was what we didn't do. We didn't just try to ram the ball down their throats against impossible odds like we usually do.
This post was edited on 11/28/14 at 11:50 am
Posted on 11/28/14 at 11:52 am to sunnydaze
quote:
107 yards passing
yes that was the sore point. Gave up on the pass game way to early. But still what little we did throw was a complete departure from what we have done in the past when you consider down and distance and to whom the ball was thrown to.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:02 pm to TigernMS12
In Cam's back pocket. I know Aggie D sucks D...but the change was so drastic, and pretty much what most wanted to see beside the pass accuracy...that some could feel that a higher up said look..change this shite or shits gonna get real. Definately not a conspiracy guy but that would sure be funny as hell if Alleva or whoever said EFF this im sick of it. Just a funny thought i guess
Posted on 11/28/14 at 12:48 pm to boxcar willie
I'll agree with that post.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:01 pm to TigaGoo4TBlew
Sounds like people are getting a false positive impression of this offense from one game. TAMU has the #105 overall defense in ypg and the #113 overall defense in rushing ypg. Running 10 jet sweeps or whatever doesn't mean we've had an offensive revolution.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:05 pm to Dead Mike
quote:
. Running 10 jet sweeps or whatever doesn't mean we've had an offensive revolution.
did you even watch the game?
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:07 pm to boxcar willie
quote:
. Running 10 jet sweeps or whatever doesn't mean we've had an offensive revolution.
quote:
did you even watch the game?
It would appear that he didn't. There was so much more imagination, misdirection, unpredictability, etc. that we've seen all year from our offense. The jet sweeps were just part of it.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:09 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Where has that offense been
That OFFENSE BEEN playing better defenses than TA&M.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:10 pm to Dead Mike
quote:
Sounds like people are getting a false positive impression of this offense from one game. TAMU has the #105 overall defense in ypg and the #113 overall defense in rushing ypg. Running 10 jet sweeps or whatever doesn't mean we've had an offensive revolution.
Dead Mike, the Rant don't accept facts too often. You might get lucky and convince them that this is a FACT.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:13 pm to lsu2006
quote:
It would appear that he didn't. There was so much more imagination, misdirection, unpredictability, etc. that we've seen all year from our offense. The jet sweeps were just part of it.
It was a god awful defense meaning even if the execution was off it could still result in a positive play. Lsu has had better offensive games this season. We also seem to get over conservative and plan for field goals before we are really forced to. That characteristic as usual was prevalent last night. I don't see how we get so dumb every time we're inside the 20. Year after year a staple of the lsu offense is high amount of FG's in red zone. Even if our conversion rate is high, we always have far more FG's than most teams in the country.
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:17 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Where has that offense been?
Playing against real SEC West defenses (not warmed-over Big 12 pseudo-defenses).
Posted on 11/28/14 at 1:28 pm to nycajun
Yes A&M d is bad but how good do u need to b when a team runs out of I with full back signaling where they r going? At least lsu did change that last night. That sweep play was used back at first of the season with # 86 and it worked . I haven't seen that play since nor have I seen 86 on the field . Who knows but maybe somebody got in miles arse about his bs offense and losing games without changing .
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News