- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michael Brown's mother can't handle the truth
Posted on 11/29/14 at 9:54 am to StrongSafety
Posted on 11/29/14 at 9:54 am to StrongSafety
quote:
And they did everything in their power to let him off
Go on. They forced some of the witnesses to corroborate Wilson's story? If that's what you are thinking the DA should be investigated and jailed. Witness intimidation or tampering is a serious problem. I would support jailing the DA if he did that.
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:01 am to roadGator
The assistant DA right before Wilsons testimony presented the jury with OUTDATED AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL Missouri law on the permissible shootings by cops. It was outlawed in the 1970s and state that cops could
Gun down fleeing victims.
ThIs was one of the many blunders. So the jurors heard his testimony already under the impression that the law said he Had the right of shooting a fleeing suspect.
Weeks later, the assistant DA apologizes to TE jury to showing them the wrong law, and gives them a new copy of the law, that says it is illegal to shoot a fleeing suspect.
When she was asked what the discrepancies were between the ourdated law and the new law, she tells them to not worry because it js not a law class, and that those minute difference don't pertain to this case.
Ill link a video with a more detailed explanation
Gun down fleeing victims.
ThIs was one of the many blunders. So the jurors heard his testimony already under the impression that the law said he Had the right of shooting a fleeing suspect.
Weeks later, the assistant DA apologizes to TE jury to showing them the wrong law, and gives them a new copy of the law, that says it is illegal to shoot a fleeing suspect.
When she was asked what the discrepancies were between the ourdated law and the new law, she tells them to not worry because it js not a law class, and that those minute difference don't pertain to this case.
Ill link a video with a more detailed explanation
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:01 am to roadGator
The assistant DA right before Wilsons testimony presented the jury with OUTDATED AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL Missouri law on the permissible shootings by cops. It was outlawed in the 1970s and state that cops could
Gun down fleeing victims.
ThIs was one of the many blunders. So the jurors heard his testimony already under the impression that the law said he Had the right of shooting a fleeing suspect.
Weeks later, the assistant DA apologizes to TE jury to showing them the wrong law, and gives them a new copy of the law, that says it is illegal to shoot a fleeing suspect.
When she was asked what the discrepancies were between the ourdated law and the new law, she tells them to not worry because it js not a law class, and that those minute difference don't pertain to this case.
Ill link a video with a more detailed explanation
Gun down fleeing victims.
ThIs was one of the many blunders. So the jurors heard his testimony already under the impression that the law said he Had the right of shooting a fleeing suspect.
Weeks later, the assistant DA apologizes to TE jury to showing them the wrong law, and gives them a new copy of the law, that says it is illegal to shoot a fleeing suspect.
When she was asked what the discrepancies were between the ourdated law and the new law, she tells them to not worry because it js not a law class, and that those minute difference don't pertain to this case.
Ill link a video with a more detailed explanation
Posted on 11/29/14 at 10:07 am to roadGator
wilson should have never been able to leave the scene of tbe crime by himself, right after the shooting. How is that a permissible protocol? I've never heard of a murder suspect being trusted to drive himself away from the scene in a cop car. You could make an argument that they were covering for his arse right there.
Also, what DNA was found on the gun? Was it blood or was it fingerprints ?
Well they never checked the gun for finger prints. So that cause some doubt for me. It is possible that Browns blood is on the gun. That does not mean he grabbed. He was shot at close range that might explain it. Remember his DNa was found in the car, and it was his smeared blood.
Also, what DNA was found on the gun? Was it blood or was it fingerprints ?
Well they never checked the gun for finger prints. So that cause some doubt for me. It is possible that Browns blood is on the gun. That does not mean he grabbed. He was shot at close range that might explain it. Remember his DNa was found in the car, and it was his smeared blood.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)