- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do most conservatives embrace a lack of evidence re: climate change but not religion?
Posted on 11/23/14 at 3:59 pm to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 11/23/14 at 3:59 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:Et tu, Brute?
A lot of the climate change predictions failed to materialize.
To be fair, the same can be said of many religious prophecies.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Are you categorizing religion as part of science class, or are you dropping AGW into religion class?
Posted on 11/23/14 at 4:08 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Are you categorizing religion as part of science class, or are you dropping AGW into religion class?
I'm not convinced based on the evidence available that humans are the primary force driving the global warming trend. Sure we have an impact, but I find the factual claims of human driven exponential increases in warming rates to be somewhat spurious.
So I would say that anyone who claims to know beyond all doubt that humans are the primary cause of global warming are in the same class as those who claim to know that Jesus was God and rose from the dead, yes. Both groups infer something substantial based on limited evidence and in some instances evidence to the contrary.
This post was edited on 11/23/14 at 4:09 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)