re: Why do most conservatives embrace a lack of evidence re: climate change but not religion?

quote:

---

Until someone can provide evidence of a supernatural cause, I see no reason to believe just because it makes people feel all warm and fuzzy

---

The very idea of *supernatural* implies that a particular observed phenomena could be outside or contradictory to Universal Law. Which (IMO) would be utterly impossible. Nothing...can be 'outside', as all things perceived are innate to the Whole. It is more a matter of "provide evidence"; I.e., understanding that particular interactive dynamic in a way that we can communicate it. And since abstract ideas are subjectively perceived...understanding/evidence, all comes down to the "eyes that see and ears that hear" thing.