re: .

When the objective stats completely contradict a subjective judgement, you can either admit that the hyperbolic nature of your judgement is flawed or attempt to minimize the objective statistics. A rational individual wouldn't try to completely minimize the stats in this situation. So I wouldn't be surprised if your Alex Smith judgement is just one of many examples of your subjectivity completely contradicts objectivity. So either you need to be paid millions by an organization because you can see what others can't, or your completely off-base.