- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Need opinions on if this trade is veto worthy? I'm commish
Posted on 11/14/14 at 6:02 am
Posted on 11/14/14 at 6:02 am
Team A gives up Mark Ingram, Russell Wilson, Julio Jones and Andre Johnson
Team B gives up luck, Antonio brown, and Darren McFadden.
Team A current team
Qb Wilson
Rb Charles, Morris, Ingram, AP, knile Davis
Wr Julio, Watkins, AJ, Baldwin
Team B current team
Qb luck
Rb Bradshaw, Ellington, Dmac, blue
Wr brown, Patterson, Wayne, Landry, shorts, John brown
I am commish of this league where I approve all trades. Both teams are 5-5, the guy trading brown mainly wants a better rb and he was okay trading brown since there are only three weeks left in regular season and brown has a bye next week. I got an email from another league member saying trade looked lopsided so wanted to get yall opinions
Team B gives up luck, Antonio brown, and Darren McFadden.
Team A current team
Qb Wilson
Rb Charles, Morris, Ingram, AP, knile Davis
Wr Julio, Watkins, AJ, Baldwin
Team B current team
Qb luck
Rb Bradshaw, Ellington, Dmac, blue
Wr brown, Patterson, Wayne, Landry, shorts, John brown
I am commish of this league where I approve all trades. Both teams are 5-5, the guy trading brown mainly wants a better rb and he was okay trading brown since there are only three weeks left in regular season and brown has a bye next week. I got an email from another league member saying trade looked lopsided so wanted to get yall opinions
Posted on 11/14/14 at 6:10 am to LSU1018
I mean team A definitely wins this trade but I don't think it's veto worthy. Both teams get what they want, no obvious collusion. Let it go
Edit: I missed the part where team B gives up Luck. I still don't think it's veto worthy
Edit: I missed the part where team B gives up Luck. I still don't think it's veto worthy
This post was edited on 11/14/14 at 6:36 am
Posted on 11/14/14 at 6:33 am to papz
I think its pretty fair.
Ingram is killing it, Julio has star potential and he gets a solid QB.
Ingram is killing it, Julio has star potential and he gets a solid QB.
Posted on 11/14/14 at 6:34 am to LSU1018
not veto worthy. Brown, Luck are amazing. DMac is serviceable.
While Ingram is playing out of his mind right now and Julio jones is liable to blowup any Sunday.
No fantasy trades are ever completely equal, but this one is fair for sure.
While Ingram is playing out of his mind right now and Julio jones is liable to blowup any Sunday.
No fantasy trades are ever completely equal, but this one is fair for sure.
This post was edited on 11/14/14 at 10:28 am
Posted on 11/14/14 at 6:42 am to LSU1018
I think it looks like a pretty fair trade.
Posted on 11/14/14 at 7:11 am to LSU1018
The person who emailed you is a bitch, and you should tell him so.
Posted on 11/14/14 at 7:13 am to Joshjrn
Out of all the "is this fair/collusion" threads I've read on here this season, this one is actually one of the more fair ones. Let it fly, and deduct 15 pts from whiny players point total. Call it a "b*tching fee"
Posted on 11/14/14 at 7:54 am to LSU1018
Other member in your league is a pussy
Posted on 11/14/14 at 8:59 am to CheeseburgerEddie
Pretty fair trade to me...they each get what they want. 5-5 teams trying to make the playoffs are not gonna collude and that is what veto should be used for.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News