Started By
Message

re: What Would It Take To Start WW3?

Posted on 11/12/14 at 4:02 pm to
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
13355 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

The reason for this is there are no alliances that would entangle any of the major powers to the point they'd have to fight over anything in the middle east.


quote:

There are massive reserves of gas & oil there and as these countries jostle for control, the chances of a wider, at least regional, conflict grows.


Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64772 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

The reason for this is there are no alliances that would entangle any of the major powers to the point they'd have to fight over anything in the middle east.


quote:
There are massive reserves of gas & oil there and as these countries jostle for control, the chances of a wider, at least regional, conflict grows.


I see what you're saying, troy but there is one thing missing. No major world power is trying to gain control of the oil in the middle east through military means, nor does it appear likely that any will try this anytime in the foreseeable future. The only place where there is any question of control over major oil or gas resources at this time is in the South China Sea. It's possible there may be some similar development of tensions in the Arctic Ocean region between the US, Canada and Russia as well. But as for the middle east, there is little to no chance the major world powers come to conflict over control of the oil there.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram