- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So... Pistol Pete was an interesting guy,.. Just watched his Behind the Glory
Posted on 11/8/14 at 10:50 am to Smalls
Posted on 11/8/14 at 10:50 am to Smalls
quote:
Dale Brown had all of his college shots charted. If there had been a three point line, he would have averaged 60+ points per game.
No. He only averaged 44 points as it was. That would mean that he would need at least 16 of his made shots per game to be behind the 3 point line. Take away his 10 or so points per game he made from free throws, and that would mean that ~90% of his makes were from further than 20 feet. So no.
2
Posted on 11/8/14 at 11:03 am to TheSexecutioner
Exactly. Pete averaged 44. Say he averaged 10 ppg from FT. That means 34 from the field or 17 made from the field. Even if all 17 of those shots were 3 pointers that would put him at 61.
Brown didn't chart every game. He charted one and said Pete would have scored 60+ if there was a 3 pt line
Brown didn't chart every game. He charted one and said Pete would have scored 60+ if there was a 3 pt line
Posted on 11/8/14 at 11:29 am to TheSexecutioner
The thinking is that knowing there was a 3 point line, he could have sat back and popped 3's all day. He was shooting from down-town without any benefit of a 3. With his ball handling and passing, the defense would have to pick their poison. 60 seems high, but 50 would be reasonable.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News