- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The brandin cooks cwandary...
Posted on 10/17/14 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 10/17/14 at 3:32 pm
Yeah, I know its quandary. I took artistic license with the spelling for alliterative purposes. And yes, I know alliteration is technically just similar sounds in the beginning of words so quandary would work just as well, but this is written not spoken...
Anyway, what do people think of Brandin Cooks versus the detroit defense? It is a dome. It is the week after a bye. These are good signs for the saints.
On the other side, the saints haven't been nearly as strong as last year.
In my particular case, I need to start a wr and a flex. I have three choices for two spots...
ODB, Cooks, and Mckinnon.
Right now I am going with Cooks and Mckinnon, however a case could be made for any two of those three. Maybe ODB is just a must start in your opinion because Cruz is out.
What do people think...
Anyway, what do people think of Brandin Cooks versus the detroit defense? It is a dome. It is the week after a bye. These are good signs for the saints.
On the other side, the saints haven't been nearly as strong as last year.
In my particular case, I need to start a wr and a flex. I have three choices for two spots...
ODB, Cooks, and Mckinnon.
Right now I am going with Cooks and Mckinnon, however a case could be made for any two of those three. Maybe ODB is just a must start in your opinion because Cruz is out.
What do people think...
Posted on 10/17/14 at 3:40 pm to thetempleowl
quote:hahahahahahahahaha
cwandry
Posted on 10/17/14 at 3:42 pm to OneMoreTime
quote:
hahahahahahahahaha
Helpful...
Oh, no, it wasn't.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 4:09 pm to thetempleowl
I think ODB might be the better play. I think he will be their number one option. I could be wrong of course, but I have a feeling he's going to start putting up some good points.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 5:04 pm to thetempleowl
I'd go Cooks over ODB. The rookie who's been a big part of his team since day 1 versus the rookie just seeing the field for the first time.
Cooks has been heavily involved all year(much more than Colston) and will get more looks with Graham out.
Cooks has been heavily involved all year(much more than Colston) and will get more looks with Graham out.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 5:50 pm to ATX Horn
quote:
Cooks has been heavily involved all year(much more than Colston) and will get more looks with Graham out.
This is my thinking but they are facing the lions.
The vagiants are playing dallas and might have more success on offense. And if so, ODB will likely be big part because even now he is better than randle.
Should I start both wrs over mckinnon?
Posted on 10/17/14 at 5:53 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
I could be wrong of course
yeah
Posted on 10/17/14 at 7:09 pm to lsuguy84
Cooks for sure. Especially in a PPR. He will be peppered targets left and right if Graham is out. He's a borderline must start despite the stingy D with no Graham.
Obj is unproven and in a very, very inconsistent offense.
Obj is unproven and in a very, very inconsistent offense.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:42 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
Most analysts have Colston benefiting from Graham's absence
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:51 pm to thetempleowl
quote:
cwandary
Quandary*
Posted on 10/17/14 at 10:57 pm to thetempleowl
With Graham out, Cooks will definitely be the guy to help move the chains.
In a PPR he will have a solid day for sure. If he finds the endzone, he will have a huge day.
In a PPR he will have a solid day for sure. If he finds the endzone, he will have a huge day.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 11:21 pm to HurricaneDunc
Por que no Los dos?
No Graham means about 10 targets gets redistributed. In theory, plenty of people could benefit. Thomas, cooks, Ingram, and Colston could all get more touches.
No Graham means about 10 targets gets redistributed. In theory, plenty of people could benefit. Thomas, cooks, Ingram, and Colston could all get more touches.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 11:22 pm to Mouth
either going with Cooks or Andre Holmes this week.
Holmes has been a monster the last few weeks.
Holmes has been a monster the last few weeks.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News