Started By
Message

Pointless now but why was delay of game not called agnst. Fla.?

Posted on 10/12/14 at 11:41 pm
Posted by Storm22
Biloxi
Member since Jul 2013
922 posts
Posted on 10/12/14 at 11:41 pm
If the refs acknowledged the fact Fla. was taking their time before the kick, enough to add another ten seconds to the game clock. Why was there no flag for doing so? Isn't this delay of game by the defense?
This post was edited on 10/12/14 at 11:42 pm
Posted by G I Jeaux
off duty
Member since Aug 2009
2171 posts
Posted on 10/12/14 at 11:43 pm to
Should have been called as a delay
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112484 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 12:04 am to
i rwally thought we were going to get screwed. they let them sit on us for 15 seconds before stopping it
Posted by Big Sway
Member since Nov 2009
5133 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 1:47 am to
frick Fla. That's why.
This post was edited on 10/13/14 at 1:48 am
Posted by SBC
Member since Oct 2005
6870 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 1:54 am to
should have been.....no doubt about it. LSU did exactly what they should have done in that situation.
Posted by Gulffisherman
Bogalusa
Member since Oct 2009
3531 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 6:10 am to
Should have been flagged
Posted by Box Geauxrilla
Member since Jun 2013
19123 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:07 am to
Agree. Muschamp was whining like he got screwed when really they screwed us out of 5 yards.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
69364 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 10:16 am to
Seems like there is only a delay from the ref looking at the clock til UF snaps the ball. Everyone else gets delay of game rt when clock hits zero.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18692 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 11:03 am to
SEC Blog on ESPN.com posted an article in the morning links that explained everything.

While delay of game is the primary call, the ref also has the discretion to reset the clock. It worked out for the Tigers regardless, but it could have kept them from risking a bad exchange on the spike.
Posted by nycajun
Nothin' could be finer.....
Member since Dec 2004
18183 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 11:25 am to
Ref was doing next best thing. Was signaling for clock to stop, starting at about 00:10-12 seconds. Clock operator didn't stop it until 00:03. Ref put 7 back on clock and started it when ball marked ready. Delay of game, probably appropriate but a
judgment call in that situation,
would have moved LSU 5 yards closer (obviously) and might have given LSU opportunity to spot ball in the middle instead of on right hash (not sure about that rule). Ref probably did fairest thing, given that delay of game arguably wasn't clear-cut.
This post was edited on 10/13/14 at 11:27 am
Posted by FAF
NOLA
Member since May 2014
1427 posts
Posted on 10/13/14 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Pointless now but why was delay of game not called agnst. Fla.?


It should have been and Muschamp whined about it in his postgame interview when the officials set the clock back to 10 seconds.

If kicking a ball (vs handing it to a ref) is a delay of game, then so is refusing to get up from a pile. If not, then it could be a way for teams to slow down the HUNH; just hold the guy down long enough to sub some players.
This post was edited on 10/13/14 at 3:08 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram