- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are severly anti-gay people more likely to be gay?
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:28 am to ChineseBandit58
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:28 am to ChineseBandit58
He denied it a lot here, and was incredibly vocal in his disgust and hatred for people who are gay. I didn't really care much, but when I heard that he was survived by a partner, I was bothered.
It didn't make me mad at him. I still actually think he was a pretty good guy. But I hate that he felt the need to be so ardently anti-gay when he had a partner.
It didn't make me mad at him. I still actually think he was a pretty good guy. But I hate that he felt the need to be so ardently anti-gay when he had a partner.
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:30 am to FT
quote:
He denied it a lot here,
what?
no he didn't
quote:
and was incredibly vocal in his disgust and hatred for people who are gay.
he was disgusted with aspects of the gay culture he experienced that are worthy of criticism
quote:
But I hate that he felt the need to be so ardently anti-gay when he had a partner.
if he never had sex with the partner, then he wasn't violated God's law, in his eyes. what's so conflicting about that?
if he wasn't engaging in the pathologies present in gay culture, then how was he a hypocrite when he criticized the pathologies?
Posted on 10/7/14 at 8:46 am to FT
quote:
But I hate that he felt the need to be so ardently anti-gay when he had a partner.
I think you are confusing 'anti gay' - which he was not - with "anti gay-activist" which he definitely was.
I am not anti religion - but I sure as hell am anti "westbury babtist.'
He was opposed to stupidity in whatever form. Since he was homosexual himself, he was definitely opposed to those who put him and others like him in a bad light with their political proclivities.
I wish more 'identity' groups would do the same. I would like for Muslims to be virulently opposed to militant islamists of whatever stripe.
I would like for blacks to be virulently opposed to the political shenagagins that have be so detrimental to their culture.
You referred to LAT as a coward, perhaps even evil, for his outspokenness. I say he was proudly brave and good for how he handled himself. He didn't whimper about his situation and stay in the shadows while others 'spoke for him' - nor did he follow the activist agenda when he knew that agenda was wrong.
He didn't try to hide anything. When I visited him back in 2006 or 07, he showed me photos of himself and his partner. I didn't ask him any questions about his situation or any conflicts he may have been dealing with, not because it was 'uncomfortable' but because it was just of no interest to me. He was my friend because of other shared interests - primarily politics and LSU alum.
Charles was a good man in every sense of the word, and I rise to defend him against all attacks, whether they are out of ignorance or not. I don't think you are malevolent toward him, but I think you are ill informed.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News