- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 'Prayer Baby' drowns in church's baptism tank
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:47 pm to Darth_Vader
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:47 pm to Darth_Vader
You're full of fricking shite, Darth. I never once said such.
Kids get loose, land owners should expect that; especially when kids are constantly welcomed on said land.
It's seemingly obvious that the church did not have the tank secured and safe, considering a small child entered it, which is negligence defined.
Kids get loose, land owners should expect that; especially when kids are constantly welcomed on said land.
It's seemingly obvious that the church did not have the tank secured and safe, considering a small child entered it, which is negligence defined.
3
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:48 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
It's seemingly obvious that the church did not have the tank secured and safe, considering a small child entered it, which is negligence defined.
It certainly seems reasonable that the person in charge of the baptismal knew or should have known that there was standing water in the tank and that the entrance was not secured.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:52 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
You're full of fricking shite, Darth. I never once said such.
You said this....
quote:
They should sue the church for having such a hazardous attractive nuisance like a baptismal tank.
That statement indicates you feel the mere presence of the baptismal is grounds for the parents to sue.
quote:
It's seemingly obvious that the church did not have the tank secured and safe, considering a small child entered it, which is negligence defined.
That's not for us to decide here on a message board based off very limited information. I have never been to this church so I cannot speak to what means they had to keep this baptismal secure versus the actions of the person that was at that time responsible for the child. There are a number of variables that we don't know.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:57 pm to The Third Leg
Maybe God, Buddha, Allah whoever the frick can find the power to make you fall into one.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News