- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lindy's basketball annual/preview
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:41 am to brmark70816
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:41 am to brmark70816
quote:
Lakers- 44.0
Kings- 43.0
Pelicans- 42.5
Wolves- 42.5
Jazz- 36.0
Wow. The Kings and Lakers rate better? The Kings rating is optimistic but not outrageous because Boogie. The Lakers score is a joke. Got to sell magazines I guess. The Wolves rating is rather dubious too
As for the Pels, C, PG and SG ratings should be higher. SF should be much lower. 42.5 is on the very low end, but it's fair. This is a 6 man team that has obvious flaws and question marks within that group. 42-52 is the range I see.
1
Posted on 9/22/14 at 3:46 pm to corndeaux
quote:
Wow. The Kings and Lakers rate better?
It mainly comes from the coaching grade. The Lakers were given a 7.0 and the Kings a 6.5. If the Pelicans got a 7.0, they would be over both of those teams. So I guess they are saying that the Pelicans have more talent, but coaching is costing them..
quote:
The Lakers score is a joke. Got to sell magazines I guess.
I think the Lakers are better than you think. They had the most amount of injuries in the league last season. If they are healthy (a big if), they have a lot of experience and balance. They get back Nash and Bryant. They lost Gasol (who was injured a lot last year anyway). But they added Lin, Boozer and Randle. I could see them being .500..
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News