Started By
Message

re: Chick-fil-A sandwich too controversial for Cali High School

Posted on 9/14/14 at 6:58 pm to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30173 posts
Posted on 9/14/14 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

Are you under the illusion that a certain percentage of the population is just "born gay" and that's that? Because that also has zero basis in genetics, biology, evolution, sexology, history, anthropology, etc., etc. It'd be great if it were true, but it's not.


I doubt all gay people are born gay and I don't care. It's not really my business. Why does it matter? They want to commit to a person they love. Why is that such a big problem for you?
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69956 posts
Posted on 9/14/14 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

doubt all gay people are born gay and I don't care. It's not really my business. Why does it matter? They want to commit to a person they love. Why is that such a big problem for you?




Because it's icky
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 9/14/14 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

I doubt all gay people are born gay and I don't care. It's not really my business.
Hey, we agree! There are other factors in addition to genetics.
quote:

They want to commit to a person they love. Why is that such a big problem for you?
It's not.

Since we both agree that there are other factors besides genetics, and we can both understand that human sexuality is far more dynamic than our current constructs of gay and straight, does it not stand to reason that legitimization of homosexuality could lead to an increase in homosexuality? Can you agree this far? Now, is having more homosexuality good, bad, or neutral for society? I don't fully know. Rational arguments can be made every way.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram