- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:21 pm to transcend
When I see Ingram run I feel like he's going to explode someday. You can just see it in his eyes he wants to spike the ball and every time he gets a big run. I like that fire but the dude needs to calm down a level. He looks angry and I like that but he shouldn't be running with fits on the sidelines. Be a team player and you'll get he rock called to you more when the gameplan calls for it. This contract year obviously has him motivated. I like what I see in him. Never seen him run this fast, this healthy or this angry so soon in a season.
IMO, he needs to get more carries until he proves it's not working anymore.
IMO, he needs to get more carries until he proves it's not working anymore.
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:24 pm to deuce985
quote:
He looks angry and I like that but he shouldn't be running with fits on the sidelines. Be a team player and you'll get he rock called to you more when the gameplan calls for it.
Obviously not. He barely got put in for almost half the game. Got pissed off, then immediately got put back in and went on a tear.
I wish the defense would have played with that kind of ferocity.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:26 pm to Witecoco
quote:
I honestly wish they would play him and Thomas more together than splitting between three and four backs.
I was wanting this last year too. People have indicated last year with Sproles, and this year with Pierre, that they tip their hand on the call when they are in the backfield. This is somewhat accurate, but anytime you have two H-backs in the backfield, you are reducing your down-field ability because you are down a receiver.
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:27 pm to deuce985
I don't have any, zero, nada issues the way CSP used the f@cking backs.
A lull?
C'mon how many points did we score? Should be enough to win a damn NFL game on the road.
The offence was great except for two plays by Brees and Colston that took points off the board.
I wonder where the real issue lies?
Its not the RB's.
A lull?
C'mon how many points did we score? Should be enough to win a damn NFL game on the road.
The offence was great except for two plays by Brees and Colston that took points off the board.
I wonder where the real issue lies?
Its not the RB's.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:29 pm to goatmilker
quote:
A lull?
C'mon how many points did we score?
Guess you just missed the entire third quarter, where we threw up a goose egg.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:30 pm to goatmilker
It's not the RB's but we have two that are obviously playing better and they should be playing more. Mark should have gotten the rock more in the first half.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:30 pm to LNCHBOX
Yeah right.
We should have scored 50 points in the 3rd.
We suck.
Score every drive if CSP would just use his players like TD wants.
We should have scored 50 points in the 3rd.
We suck.
Score every drive if CSP would just use his players like TD wants.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:31 pm to goatmilker
quote:
C'mon how many points did we score
I'm not blaming the offense for anything, merely discussing one aspect of it. With that said, Sean Payton's own words, a shootout loss is on the offense...I don't agree but that's what he said.
I think a more featured role for ingram would add to the already crazy success we had on offense. why is that so offensive to people
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:31 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Yeah right.
We should have scored 50 points in the 3rd.
We suck.
Score every drive if CSP would just use his players like TD wants.
Sweet melt bro. We lost the game with the way the third quarter went.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:32 pm to LNCHBOX
Yup.
Cost us the game.
F@ck the 3rd quarter.
Next time we go from 2nd right to the 4th.
Cost us the game.
F@ck the 3rd quarter.
Next time we go from 2nd right to the 4th.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:35 pm to goatmilker
lets not forget settling for 2 fg's to start off game.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:38 pm to goatmilker
Any particular reason you're being a jackass about this?
We ran 10 plays to the Falcons 21. They got 2 TDs and we had a 3 and out and an interception. We blew a 2 possession lead and gave them all the momentum back. Most importantly, we gave our defense no rest.
The third quarter was an abortion for our offense.
ETA: And please don't take this as me blaming this loss on the offense.
We ran 10 plays to the Falcons 21. They got 2 TDs and we had a 3 and out and an interception. We blew a 2 possession lead and gave them all the momentum back. Most importantly, we gave our defense no rest.
The third quarter was an abortion for our offense.
ETA: And please don't take this as me blaming this loss on the offense.
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:41 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Most importantly, we gave our defense no rest.
I did not see much of a difference between a rested defense and a defense with no rest.
With how they played they should have just let the Falcons score on the first play of the drive after the lead.
This post was edited on 9/9/14 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:42 pm to bountyhunter
the defense got off the field very quickly, just not in a good way
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:42 pm to bountyhunter
quote:
I did not see much of a difference between a rested defense and a defense with no rest.
Of course, but I think we can all agree it wouldn't have hurt to keep them off the field a little longer
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:44 pm to LNCHBOX
More to the we had a lull cause CSP didn't use MI right.
Lots of things go into "Lulls".
What if I told you their DB's held on two possible big plays that were not called.
And what if I told you Brees called the wrong play CSP sent in that led to a punt.
What if Cooks ran the wrong route that cost us a 1st down.
Etc etc.
My point is that it was not the offence or the damn 3rd quarter but a def that was lost from the end of the 1st half to the end of the game that cost us.
Not how CSP used MI.
Sorry if I was a jackhole.
Lots of things go into "Lulls".
What if I told you their DB's held on two possible big plays that were not called.
And what if I told you Brees called the wrong play CSP sent in that led to a punt.
What if Cooks ran the wrong route that cost us a 1st down.
Etc etc.
My point is that it was not the offence or the damn 3rd quarter but a def that was lost from the end of the 1st half to the end of the game that cost us.
Not how CSP used MI.
Sorry if I was a jackhole.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:45 pm to goatmilker
quote:
What if I told you their DB's held on two possible big plays that were not called.
And what if I told you Brees called the wrong play CSP sent in that led to a punt.
and what if everyone was a dick when you wanted to discuss those things
LB has a point, you're a bit of a prick over stupid shite just because you don't agree with it.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:46 pm to goatmilker
quote:
My point is that it was not the offence or the damn 3rd quarter
If you don't think this played a part in us losing, I have nothing that will help you.
Posted on 9/9/14 at 1:46 pm to DelU249
Well I said I was sorry so go f@ck yourself then!
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News