re: The implications of the forced gay marriage legislation

Ok. I'm completely secular. I have no religious point of view whatsoever.

We know that human sexuality is a behavior that occurs. We know that the desire for it is influenced by genetics, personality, environment, and culture. Thus, like any other human behavior, our society in the long term can encourage it or discourage it, criminalize it or accept it, and cannot eradicate it. We can also understand that we are all subject to our genes and personality and culture, no different than gay people. Your genes and personality and culture and environment helped make you love football, the same way that a gay dude's genes and personality and culture and environment can make him love other men. There's no difference. We don't chalk any human behavior up to pure genetics, and it's very odd that some attempt to separate sexuality from that as if it's different.

Since we understand we are all subject to our genes and environment and culture, it is indeed indecent and unacceptable to oppress or marginalize gay people who co-exist with us. However, in the long run, we can decide through our subtle social ethos, to encourage or discourage this behavior. Why should it be encouraged? What makes gayness good for our society?

I'm not the only person who understands this - the way things actually are - and that both sides are way off base and obsessed with denying human nature. I've no doubt whatsoever there are futurists who understand this and are promoting homosexuality as a form of population control.