Started By
Message

re: What should be Americans' response to the real terrorists?

Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:02 pm to
Posted by WhoDatGreenBeret
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2013
546 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:02 pm to
Bldg 7?

Look let me clear the air here. I love discussions like this. I don't have a theory as to who brought down the towers. I, like most people believe it was Islamic terrorists. But I do not think we know everything about that day. I am always open to theories and research them the best way I can. But there's holes in the govts accusation that it was al Qaeda. There is also holes that the federal govt was responsible for that day.

What I have a problem with is how that morning is used to scare us. It's used as propaganda so the federal govt can break the law. That cannot be denied.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36852 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

In keeping with this boards ongoing, "What should be America's response" threads...

What if America discovered that the richest and most powerful people on earth are responsible for creating/controlling global terrorism, including 9/11, as well as financial terrorism.



Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

What I have a problem with is how that morning is used to scare us. It's used as propaganda so the federal govt can break the law. That cannot be denied.
Yes, but so was the cold war. So is illegal immigration. So is fricking gay marriage. Was McCarthy actually a Russian Communist who created the Soviet Union in order to control Americans? That's the leap you're making.

People may certainly see fear among the constituents, and may pounce for some measure of domestic control. To suggest this proves they are the source of the fear itself is not logical, much less definitive.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36852 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

I would add that trillions in natural resources are up for grabs in Afghanistan. Countries in the Middle East (Iraq, Iran, Syria to name a few) threatened the Petro Dollar and refused to conform to the international banking cabal pre-9/11.
Those are all being "corrected" post 9/11.


So according to your infantile thinking, "they" (presumably the evil Zionists pulling the strings on Wall Street) staged 9/11 as a pretense to win the world's sympathy and permission to invade Iraq and liberate oil fields, etc etc. One would think such dastardly villains would have had the foresight to plant Iraqi terrorists (or at least a single one) on the 9/11 so as to secure their case for invading Iraq, but that obvious notion apparently slipped the minds of the world's most ingenious cabal.

You think you're being clever and outwitting us with your gibberish theories, but the sad fact is that these theories collapse under the most basic scrutiny. They can't even pass the smell test.

Thanks for playing.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 1:13 pm
Posted by WhoDatGreenBeret
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2013
546 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:14 pm to
So again I ask you a question I asked earlier. Is the answer to continue to raise the stakes when the next attack happens? Meaning next attack do we take guns away from Americans? Do we outlaw free speech? How many of our liberties will we be willing to sacrifice in order to get this secure safe nation?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
65697 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:19 pm to
If TX is right the ONLY course is a global uprising that brings down every bank and financial institution.
Every politician world over would need to be gulaged or put to death since we don't know who all is involved or not as they are really really good at working in the shadows and pulling all the strings across the world.
Then we start all over again world wide. Rinse and repeat.
If there is another way to insure success TX I would like to hear it.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

How many of our liberties will we be willing to sacrifice in order to get this secure safe nation?

A few, apparently.
quote:

Meaning next attack do we take guns away from Americans?
Not possible, there would be mass death and likely civil war.
quote:

Do we outlaw free speech
Millions of Americans won't abide it. I won't. I can't answer for everyone.
quote:

How many of our liberties will we be willing to sacrifice in order to get this secure safe nation?
Two.

I have no idea dude. I don't really know what your point is. I don't want a totalitarian state in the name of safety. Do you think I do? I agree with you and Benjamin Franklin. I think a lot of Americans do too, hopefully the large majority, and a true overt abridging of our basic god-Given rights - life, speech, religion, the pursuit of happiness (occupational freedom) - would not be tolerated.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 1:26 pm
Posted by LSU Delts
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
2578 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:48 pm to
No verbal reply at all. I would not talk to them. Ignore them.

When an American is killed. I would hold nothing back to kill everyone of those MFers. Nothing.

You have to send a strong message. Even if it requires you are there for years. I would start with the radical leaders in the mosque. Thats where it starts and will end.
Posted by WhoDatGreenBeret
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2013
546 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 1:49 pm to
My friend then we are on the same page. Let's go have a beer


I think I'm just more open to other theories and more anti federal government than you. Nothing wrong with it either way. I just don't want the majority of this country to think daddy government is the answer and we are helpless without his safety net.
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

You think we respond to catastrophes rationally?
Yes, we don't just lash out. We actually do deliberate before we respond. Are all of our responses wise? Of course not, but that doesn't mean the decisions were made without reasonable consideration. There will be unintended consequences for every action. Some are more foreseeable than others, and all become obvious in hindsight.

Is it a coincidence that the conspiracies TxTiger has identified have had no unintended consequences to make them unsuccessful? The conspirators have been able to predict with enough accuracy the responses of the targets and all other parties to prevent the conspiracies from failing. That comes from being able to use hindsight to construct a plausible conspiracy rather than from any real conspiracies of the magnitude he is suggesting.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
35113 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

What should be your response? 


I don't think any answer to this question, if even a "great strategy" was offered, applies.

The president has access to information, allies, experts and resources most on this board aren't even aware exist. No one here can offer a meaningful answer to your question but we all should expect that our president can.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
70872 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:45 pm to
I know one American who should get back on his Haldol.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
59503 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 2:56 pm to
First off, even if the terrorism was sponsored by some shadowy group, it wouldn't make it any less real to those being killed or tortured by them.
Secondly, if these shadowy groups are so clandestine, what possible recourse would we have and how could they be found and dealt with?
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 2:57 pm
Posted by themunch
There
Member since Jan 2007
67653 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:25 pm to
WE're with you. When do we start?
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35900 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

if these shadowy groups are so clandestine, what possible recourse would we have and how could they be found and dealt with?
That is the question, isn't it.
Posted by araminta
Tennessee, USA
Member since Apr 2005
425 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:29 pm to
Bring our Troops home.
Shut down the Federal Reserve.
Drill here.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35900 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

I don't have a theory
How could you? All you've been given is a pack of lies.

I'd have to consider anyone who thinks he knows what happened on 9/11 to be a conspiracy theory nutjob.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49572 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

A conspiracy theory is defined as a proposed plot by powerful
people or organizations working together in secret to
accomplish some (usually sinister) goal
(Coady, 2006; Douglas
& Sutton, 2008; Goertzel, 1994). Popular contemporary examples
include the theory that the 9/11 attacks were planned and
carried out by elements within the American government
(Kay,
2011) and the belief that evidence of a causal link between
autism and childhood vaccination is being suppressed by an
unscrupulous medical industry (Goertzel, 2010). Conspiracy
theories are not by definition false


quote:

Spurred in part by the growth of new media, conspiracism
has become a major subcultural phenomenon. This shift has not
gone unnoticed in academia. In recent decades, there has been
an explosion of research into the psychology of belief in conspiracy
theories.
Much of this research interest has focused
on the individual correlates of conspiracy belief, but perhaps
the most consistent finding in the work on the psychology of
conspiracy theories is that belief in a particular theory is
strongly predicted by belief in others—even ostensibly unrelated
ones


quote:

One proposed
explanation for this connection is that beliefs in conspiracy
theories somehow support one another (Goertzel, 1994).
Even though the perpetrators may be different in each case, the
fact that one massive, sinister conspiracy could be successfully
executed in near-perfect secrecy suggests that many such plots
are possible. Over time, the view of the world as a place ruled
by conspiracies can lead to conspiracy becoming the default
explanation for any given event—a unitary, closed-off worldview
in which beliefs come together in a mutually supportive
network known as a monological belief system






The science behind being a kook.

LINK
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 3:32 pm
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
82363 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:40 pm to
I keep wondering why The Powers That Be haven't had the OP rubbed out yet?
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35900 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Was McCarthy actually a Russian Communist who created the Soviet Union in order to control Americans? That's the leap you're making.
No, that's the strawman you're creating.

quote:

People may certainly see fear among the constituents, and may pounce for some measure of domestic control. To suggest this proves they are the source of the fear itself is not logical, much less definitive.
Are you saying that man doesn't seek dominance and control and in the case of the OP wouldn't use whatever resource he has to achieve it?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram