- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: My wife is using an app on my 14 yr old sons phone to spy on him.
Posted on 8/14/14 at 10:01 am to GaryMyMan
Posted on 8/14/14 at 10:01 am to GaryMyMan
quote:
I think you should read La R.S. 14:81.1 more carefully before telling this guy his wife is in the clear
Ok, I read it. Now, what was your point?
I'm not sure from the OP that any pornography was involved but, assuming it was, that statute clearly does not make it illegal to receive unsolicited child pornography so what was inaccurate about what I posted.
Of course, there is a valid reason why "receipt" or "receiving" was specifically and intentionally omitted form the long list of prohibited acts.
JMHO of course, I'm not involved in public law enforcement.
2
Posted on 8/14/14 at 10:06 am to Monk
quote:
assuming it was, that statute clearly does not make it illegal to receive unsolicited child pornography so what was inaccurate about what I posted.
It isn't unsolicited you clown. She installed the app, and PAYS for the service to the tune of 50 bucks a year.
She is actively asking for suck images to be sent to her. For example, I can't go into an illegal gun suite with a thousand dollars, then claim I didn't mean to get an illegal gun if it gets raided.
So you been sneaking underage kiddir pics too, through your kids phone?
Best of luck when you go to jail and they seize your house, pedo.
Posted on 8/14/14 at 10:07 am to Monk
quote:
Ok, I read it. Now, what was your point?
My point is that assuming she doesn't immediately delete the picture(s) "from an under aged girl that was "questionable" in content", then she is in possession of it, which is against the law - if "questionable in content" means "child porn."
This post was edited on 8/14/14 at 10:09 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News