Started By
Message

re: No more K & DEF, should I replace them with another position?

Posted on 8/6/14 at 5:23 pm to
Posted by PurpleDrank18
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2011
4508 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 5:23 pm to
so you like the randomness of the kicker? Say all your players are on par with the other team, except for the kickers. Yours scores 3, the other guys scores 15, and you end up losing by 5.

My point is theres just no way to gauge a K like you can a RB, WR, QB or TE. There aren't really any metrics for Kickers. We know the tiers of the other positions tho and can strategize accordingly. There's a reason K are the last round picks in most draft. Fantasy already has enough randomness, IMO I want to limit that, if I can. which starts with getting rid of the kicker. Then potentially adding a flex spot instead.

ETA:
I'm not trying to convince you, just showing why people wouldn't like it. If you like the kicker then by all means keep it if it makes FF more fun for ya. I'm just saying i wouldn't lose any sleep if the K position disappeared.
This post was edited on 8/6/14 at 5:30 pm
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9331 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 5:24 pm to
Fantasy football is random.
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
28620 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 5:25 pm to
Gostkowski was better than a lot of RBs last season. Kickers are worth playing
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram