Started By
Message

re: "Stop blaming black parents for underachieving kids"

Posted on 8/1/14 at 10:55 am to
Posted by MetArl15
Washington, DC
Member since Apr 2007
9524 posts
Posted on 8/1/14 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Yes, they are. If the child comes before the commitment, then the likelihood of the mother having to raise the child by herself is pretty significant. Society, unfortunately, is far too accepting of absentee fathers.
The likelihood may rise, but until the parent actually leaves the house, there is no problem. An unmarried couple who decides to have kids and raise them together in a constructive way is in no way a detriment to society. The wedlock part is independently inconsequential.
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 8/1/14 at 11:25 am to
quote:

The likelihood may rise, but until the parent actually leaves the house, there is no problem. An unmarried couple who decides to have kids and raise them together in a constructive way is in no way a detriment to society. The wedlock part is independently inconsequential


OK at this point we are arguing semantics. I agree with the other poster though out of wetlock births reduce the chances of a two parent home significantly. Sure there are two parent homes where the parents remain unmarried but the are like lottery winners few and far between. I would wager two parent unmarried households make up far less than 1% of our present demographics so that's is kind of a red herring you threw out there. Also the number of sexual partners you have certainly effects likelihood of not only getting married but staying together.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram