- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Make an argument against a "loser pays" judicial system
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So if you reject a reasonable settlement offer and then lose, you're on the hook for the legal fees from the point the offer was made. we do kind of have this in place with offers of judgments, just fwiw
I think you've done an excellent job explaining why loser pays is a bad idea, however, offers of judgment in federal court do not shift attorney's fees unless costs are defined to include attorney's fees, such as civil rights cases.
Posted on 7/27/14 at 11:54 pm to casualobserver
lol that's why i said "kind of"
Posted on 7/28/14 at 7:32 am to casualobserver
Problem with OOJs is if you get a "zero" against the other side, you cannot act on the OOJ.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News