re: St George organizers fail to get enough signatures for Nov vote

I've been reading these topics for weeks now when they pop up and I've never responded. This has spurred me to make an account just to reply.

The majority of your posts that I've seen are 2 things: 1)rehashing nonsensical "facts" that aren't facts at all 2) Posting a list of things that Russian has said that you think wins you arguments, despite his polite responses to the list you keep posting.

It is very silly, but most importantly, it is boring. Get some new material. It makes lurking less amusing when petty shite gets repetitive.

On another note, I would wonder if it is possible to challenge petition signatures on ethical grounds as it has been witnessed that petition gatherers/volunteers are misrepresenting the actual petition. The petition is supporting the incorporation of SG, notthe right to vote on the issue. If people were misled to think that all the petition does is "bring it to a vote" then they need to be expunged as those signatures are not in good faith towards what the petition actually says. I get the feeling that a chunk of people signed because the "right to vote" is something they want to have while not understanding how petitions actually work. And unfortunately some SG volunteers have been quoted to using this line of thinking in order to drum up more signatures. Which is ethically wrong.