Barrymanalow

Taking your ball and going home. So bad at play time.

Jumping for joy. Who is Janice White?

So you had nothing. Ok then!

On the other hand, all of the properties were notified and given the requisite amount of time to file the complaint to undo it. And they didn't. I've gathered that most rail companies don't get into local politics.

Well, we both know that hyperbole doesn't help a discussion. I wasn't out to show she is a great judge, I just happened to have some time to read the things Sprocket was too lazy to do. If his actual point was different, I'd like to see it, but I was just going off what I assumed he wanted people to study out.

Well, turns out not being able to sleep really does help you out.

I assume you are associating campaign donations with impropriety. And that this Possa person donating to a campaign = corruption. So, I read some of Clark's reports and noticed that a lot of law firms donated to her. So I went to check Kay Bates's reports just to see if this may be some sort of pattern. Can you believe Possa donated just as much to this other judge? And that her list is dominated by law firms as well? And as luck would have it, its Joseph Possa that donated cash on these forms that I read. In full disclosure, Stephanie Possa did donate an in-kind donation of a band.

I know that campaign disclosure reports can be tricky, and that SG people don't have much experience in...doing them, but please. Learn to read.

LINK

LINK

LINK
LINK

So you got nothing. Don't go making broad generalizations. I hear that gets you in trouble if you don't have specifics.

Wait, wait, I read this thing earlier that is kind of applicable.

quote:

---

Youre not making sense. One minute you are speaking of Woody Jenkins' motivation, the next you are making broad SG generalizations. If you want to debate something you'll need to be more specific.

---

If we replace the bold word with Clark...holy shite.

quote:

---

we knew all along how Clark would rule.

---

How did we know that? I'm curious. I was unaware that it was a foregone conclusion other than Jenkins's flimsy argument.

quote:

---

Jenkins motivation for the suit can be explained by his support for SG, or possibly just because he saw the sheisty shite that went down with the annexation of MOLA and Kip and it made him mad.

---

Oh. Well those aren't the things he said in court today. And none of that would've worked either.

When I say $$, I thought it was implied that he was working towards the support of SG in order to keep the MOLA in the SG proposed limits. My bad if I was unclear.

quote:

---

Jenkins motivation for supporting SG can be explained by my previous post on the subject of schools, his previous support for the ISD, and his disdain for Taylor. He may also support SG because he wants to profit from another newspaper, but that doesn't have anything to do with a MOLA annexation lawsuit

---

Ok then. Good insight.

So we agree its about $$ and not principle?

So...yeah. I'm having trouble following whatever you are trying to say.