Started By
Message

re: St. George backers nervous about 'Frontline'

Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:00 pm to
Posted by armytiger96
Member since Sep 2007
1253 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 9:00 pm to
How so? I never mentioned race. I just stated that in a given population if 80% of that population lives below the poverty limit then that population will not have a school system that is on par with a population where there better distribution of means. This applies to Livingston Parish, S. Dakota, Alaska, or EBR.

I didn't assume that the 80% was comprised of a single race. You did so maybe you should point to yourself as the racist. I just repeated a stat that I heard on the radio two years ago.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67601 posts
Posted on 6/26/14 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

I didn't assume that the 80% was comprised of a single race. You did so maybe you should point to yourself as the racist. I just repeated a stat that I heard on the radio two years ago.


I'm a realist not a racist. The proponents of St. George want to throw the race card. Read this thread. You said the St. George district had a part in electing Kip. Why would you make that statement when I never brought up the black mayor...no one had until you did. I was just pointing out that is evidence of who the real racists are in this parish...research how each race voted and tell me which one voted for race more than the other.

It's only about race because that is the only argument BR can make against SG. Instead of facing the facts that the EBR school system sucks and trying to please the SG proponents with better schools they just throw out "well they are racist and want lily white schools". fricking pathetic.

BTW I live in 70808 and I can't fault the SG proponents one bit.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram