- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hey WAFB your alert about annexation is inaccurate
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:56 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:56 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Thanks.
If that is the statute the lawsuit is filed under then it's a slam dunk for the annexation. There's a simple 3 question test the annexation must satisfy, 1) reasonableness, 2) sufficient signatures, and 3) compliance with the EBR Plan of Government's process for annexations.
I say "if" because the pages before and after that page have exceptions and other "clarifications" that may make EBR/BR not applicable to that statute. I don't feel like taking the time to research those exceptions and clarifications.
Thanks again.![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconcheers.gif)
If that is the statute the lawsuit is filed under then it's a slam dunk for the annexation. There's a simple 3 question test the annexation must satisfy, 1) reasonableness, 2) sufficient signatures, and 3) compliance with the EBR Plan of Government's process for annexations.
I say "if" because the pages before and after that page have exceptions and other "clarifications" that may make EBR/BR not applicable to that statute. I don't feel like taking the time to research those exceptions and clarifications.
Thanks again.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconcheers.gif)
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:00 pm to LSURussian
If I remember correctly, one of the arguments from Woody Jenkins petition was that it wasn't "reasonable" based on the contiguous land issue. Don't think that's really gonna fly in court though.
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:00 pm to LSURussian
Did anyone catch that if annexation is overturned by a judge then that property has to wait 1 year before attempting another annexation? That's an interesting part of the law.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)