- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hey WAFB your alert about annexation is inaccurate
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:33 pm to LSURussian
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:33 pm to LSURussian
Just did a quick search: LINK
To summarize: After the annexation ordinance was passed, a suit must be filed within the next 30 days to contest it. Once a judgment is rendered, the annexation goes into effect 10 days later unless the ruling is appealed. You only have 5 days from the initial judgment to file an appeal.
To summarize: After the annexation ordinance was passed, a suit must be filed within the next 30 days to contest it. Once a judgment is rendered, the annexation goes into effect 10 days later unless the ruling is appealed. You only have 5 days from the initial judgment to file an appeal.
2
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:54 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Thanks for the link Mickey. Seems to me the law is pretty clear in this case on the rules of a court challenge to annexation.
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:56 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Thanks.
If that is the statute the lawsuit is filed under then it's a slam dunk for the annexation. There's a simple 3 question test the annexation must satisfy, 1) reasonableness, 2) sufficient signatures, and 3) compliance with the EBR Plan of Government's process for annexations.
I say "if" because the pages before and after that page have exceptions and other "clarifications" that may make EBR/BR not applicable to that statute. I don't feel like taking the time to research those exceptions and clarifications.
Thanks again.
If that is the statute the lawsuit is filed under then it's a slam dunk for the annexation. There's a simple 3 question test the annexation must satisfy, 1) reasonableness, 2) sufficient signatures, and 3) compliance with the EBR Plan of Government's process for annexations.
I say "if" because the pages before and after that page have exceptions and other "clarifications" that may make EBR/BR not applicable to that statute. I don't feel like taking the time to research those exceptions and clarifications.
Thanks again.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News