- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bitcoin faces biggest threat yet: a miner takeover
Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:14 am to htownjeep
Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:14 am to htownjeep
What first intrigued me about bitcoin was the economics.
And what he is stating I am fully understanding and his point isn't that wrong which is why people like Peter Todd are developing ideas like Tree Chains which is what I'm trying to get across.
And what he is stating I am fully understanding and his point isn't that wrong which is why people like Peter Todd are developing ideas like Tree Chains which is what I'm trying to get across.
Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:18 am to joshnorris14
Then explain Tree Chain in your own words. How will Tree Chains make Bitcoin mainstream?
This is my major issue with you Josh. You never have an original thought on the matter. You quote other people.
You often say "we" do not understand the technology, yet you always fail to put it in your "own" words.
As someone who researches Bitcoin as much as you, you cannot put together a coherent statement on the topic. You confuse topics and revert to outside sources for discussion. How on earth can this be the future when years of study on Bitcoin still leaves an advanced user like yourself confused?
Step up to the plate boy.
This is my major issue with you Josh. You never have an original thought on the matter. You quote other people.
You often say "we" do not understand the technology, yet you always fail to put it in your "own" words.
As someone who researches Bitcoin as much as you, you cannot put together a coherent statement on the topic. You confuse topics and revert to outside sources for discussion. How on earth can this be the future when years of study on Bitcoin still leaves an advanced user like yourself confused?
Step up to the plate boy.
This post was edited on 6/18/14 at 9:27 am
Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:26 am to joshnorris14
LINK
I can't believe people associated with bitcoins would be dishonest. No way!!!
quote:
Two Researchers Think ‘Armageddon’ Is Nigh for Bitcoin
Bitcoin’s integrity is being threatened in a massive way — but not by a government attack, in this case, but rather by the very people who make bitcoin happen.
While the pair acknowledges the possibility of a “51 percenter” remaining honest, they stress the point that having to depend on honesty undermines a key component of what made bitcoin attractive in the first place — and they note that GHash has been implicated in shady “double-spend” activities before.
I can't believe people associated with bitcoins would be dishonest. No way!!!
Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:34 am to joshnorris14
quote:How will tree chains alter the advantages of economies of scale among miners? You have not provided an explanation of how this will be accomplished, nor have you provided a link to a source that provides an explanation. Tree chains may alter how people compete to mine Bitcoins, or whatever successor takes its place, but they do not eliminate the rewards of getting there first. As long as there are economic benefits to mining there will be competition, and competitors with advantages of economies of scale will be more successful. Their success will force out competition making control of 51% of the computing power more likely.
And what he is stating I am fully understanding and his point isn't that wrong which is why people like Peter Todd are developing ideas like Tree Chains which is what I'm trying to get across.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News