Started By
Message

re: Bitcoin faces biggest threat yet: a miner takeover

Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:14 am to
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45313 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:14 am to
What first intrigued me about bitcoin was the economics.

And what he is stating I am fully understanding and his point isn't that wrong which is why people like Peter Todd are developing ideas like Tree Chains which is what I'm trying to get across.

Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9847 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:18 am to
Then explain Tree Chain in your own words. How will Tree Chains make Bitcoin mainstream?


This is my major issue with you Josh. You never have an original thought on the matter. You quote other people.

You often say "we" do not understand the technology, yet you always fail to put it in your "own" words.

As someone who researches Bitcoin as much as you, you cannot put together a coherent statement on the topic. You confuse topics and revert to outside sources for discussion. How on earth can this be the future when years of study on Bitcoin still leaves an advanced user like yourself confused?

Step up to the plate boy.
This post was edited on 6/18/14 at 9:27 am
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127019 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:26 am to
LINK
quote:

Two Researchers Think ‘Armageddon’ Is Nigh for Bitcoin

Bitcoin’s integrity is being threatened in a massive way — but not by a government attack, in this case, but rather by the very people who make bitcoin happen.

While the pair acknowledges the possibility of a “51 percenter” remaining honest, they stress the point that having to depend on honesty undermines a key component of what made bitcoin attractive in the first place — and they note that GHash has been implicated in shady “double-spend” activities before.


I can't believe people associated with bitcoins would be dishonest. No way!!!
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 9:34 am to
quote:

And what he is stating I am fully understanding and his point isn't that wrong which is why people like Peter Todd are developing ideas like Tree Chains which is what I'm trying to get across.
How will tree chains alter the advantages of economies of scale among miners? You have not provided an explanation of how this will be accomplished, nor have you provided a link to a source that provides an explanation. Tree chains may alter how people compete to mine Bitcoins, or whatever successor takes its place, but they do not eliminate the rewards of getting there first. As long as there are economic benefits to mining there will be competition, and competitors with advantages of economies of scale will be more successful. Their success will force out competition making control of 51% of the computing power more likely.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram