- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question about last names
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:49 am to HoopyD
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:49 am to HoopyD
Well with the exception of a couple goofy Negros like World Peace and Ocho Cinco, last names do not typically just come to be out of thin air.
So, then you have to consider cases of only sons not producing a son them selves to carry on the name. This happens all the time.
I'm going with decreasing.
So, then you have to consider cases of only sons not producing a son them selves to carry on the name. This happens all the time.
I'm going with decreasing.
2
Posted on 6/16/14 at 10:21 am to Clyde Tipton
I'm gonna have to go with decreasing as well. In the US, people are having less children and therefore it is more likely a couple could have only a girl or two. If so, the likelihood of that last name not being carried on increases.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 10:30 am to Clyde Tipton
quote:
So, then you have to consider cases of only sons not producing a son them selves to carry on the name. This happens all the time.
I'm going with decreasing.
you have to throw in the wetback coeficient.
they create new names all the time to get the welfare etc.
I am going with increasing.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News