Started By
Message

re: World Cup Viewers vs. Super Bowl Viewers (pic)

Posted on 6/12/14 at 8:42 am to
Posted by Bottom9
Arsenal Til I Die
Member since Jul 2010
21843 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Well the World Cup is weeks long while the Super Bowl is 4 hrs...



Did you even read the OP? Serious question. This is just a stupid statement to make.

THE WORLD CUP FINAL. NOTTTT the entire World Cup. The World Cup final in 2010 was 3 hours long. Compare that to the 4 hours of the Superbowl.

If we were to see a graphic of the number of people who watched any of the 64 games of the 2010 World Cup, you'd probably be looking at 1.5-2 billion people
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
32019 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 8:43 am to
No I thought it was talking about the World Cup as a whole. I'm glad I made that mistake though so you could freak out and go on your funny little tirade
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125526 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 8:44 am to
quote:

If we were to see a graphic of the number of people who watched any of the 64 games of the 2010 World Cup, you'd probably be looking at 1.5-2 billion people



I saw something that said around 118 million in the US at least watch part of a game in 2010
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10698 posts
Posted on 6/12/14 at 8:44 am to
One thing I don't like is people who watch the Super Bowl for the commercials and don't really follow football.

I'd gladly pay like 20 bucks for PPV to not have people each the superbowl just for the commercials.

People watch the world cup for the game NOT the commercials.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram