Started By
Message

re: Normandy- Omaha Beach question

Posted on 6/7/14 at 9:47 pm to
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51945 posts
Posted on 6/7/14 at 9:47 pm to
Oh, then I guess those destroyer captains were just stupid getting in so close to give gunnery support when they could have done almost as well without risking getting beached.

They could do it fairly accurately at long range with perfect conditions.



There weren't perfect conditions in the Channel on D-day.
This post was edited on 6/7/14 at 9:50 pm
Posted by Spaceman Spiff
Savannah
Member since Sep 2012
17583 posts
Posted on 6/7/14 at 10:08 pm to
Of course when you are firing point blank into targets that can be seen, then that will make a difference. But to say that they werent accurate is ridiculous. The troops were able to land, but they weren't unopposed, were they?

Your point is valid because the gunners had eyes on target making it much easier to hit smaller, dug in targets. However, that wasn't enough regardless of weather conditions. My previous.examples of the Pacific theater battles disprove your weather arguments. Think about Tarawa, Iwo, and the rest. Our losses were enormous and the weather was clear as a bell with naval and airel bombardment...those defenders were no more dug in than the Germans were, so how do you account for that?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram