- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ESPN's Adrian Melville ranks top-23 US soccer players
Posted on 5/31/14 at 10:20 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 5/31/14 at 10:20 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Are there really no US soccer players of enough quality to be ranked in the top 100 in the world? Just trying to learn a little about the sport with the world cup coming up and reading lists of the top players in the world and not one list that I read lists a US player, even a list that went up to the top 100. Are we really that far behind the rest of the world? I thought we had closed the gap and were a legitimate decent quality team.
Posted on 5/31/14 at 10:31 pm to boxcar willie
quote:
Are there really no US soccer players of enough quality to be ranked in the top 100 in the world? Just trying to learn a little about the sport with the world cup coming up and reading lists of the top players in the world and not one list that I read lists a US player, even a list that went up to the top 100. Are we really that far behind the rest of the world? I thought we had closed the gap and were a legitimate decent quality team.
Who wrote the article? U.S. soccer doesn't get much respect especially from English people. Howard is the only one who would make such a list.
Being a top 100 player in the world is pretty tough though. There are a lot of very good players walking the earth right now.
Posted on 5/31/14 at 10:59 pm to boxcar willie
quote:
Are there really no US soccer players of enough quality to be ranked in the top 100 in the world?
No there aren't and not even any that are close to Top 100. Howard and Bradley are the most accomplished and are great players but not near the top 100 which is extremely rarefied air.
quote:
Are we really that far behind the rest of the world? I thought we had closed the gap and were a legitimate decent quality team.
In the sense of the USA actually having a chance of winning a WC, yes, we need to one day produce players that are in the top 100 and a lot of them.
History shows that most WC winners not only have numerous players in the Top 100 but also 2, 3 or 4 that usually make lists of the Top 100 players ever to play the game: Spain 2012, Italy 2006, Brazil 2002, France 1998 etc
However, I would also say that we have more solid players than ever and are still certainly a "decent quality team" even if we lack those few top level superstars right now.
There's only a few teams that are just ridiculously stacked with talent (Brazil, Spain, Germany, Argentina, Italy --- you know, the teams that usually win). . . after those you'll more often find teams with some Top100 players but also some weaknesses in their lineups.
At the same time, there's also a lot more like France, England, Colombia, Belgium, Portugal, Chile, Uruguay, usually Holland etc who's "weak links" would probably start for the US too.
This post was edited on 5/31/14 at 11:03 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)