Technically you didn't 'say' it. But you did write it. I guess I'd better be more specific before you claim you didn't write it: you did enter it into some type of electronic device that was connected to the internet and displayed on this board. Let's see if you can parse those words.....

Is it a moral victory of some kind for you if you can believe any of the businesses that were annexed did not initiate the contact with the city? Are you that desperate now?

The bottom line is those businesses did NOT want to be in St George even if the odds were such that St George would not happen anyway.

And those businesses got what they wanted from the CP council....by an overwhelming 9 to 3 vote. Not the 'close' 7-5 vote that many SG true believers were predicting as recently as earlier this week.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by moneyg

Member since Jun 2006

56954 posts

Posted on 5/15/14 at 3:55 pm to LSURussian

quote:
Technically you didn't 'say' it. But you did write it. I guess I'd better be more specific before you claim you didn't write it: you did enter it into some type of electronic device that was connected to the internet and displayed on this board. Let's see if you can parse those words.....

Do you know how I know you know you're losing the argument?

It's because you no longer debate substance, merely form. This entire thread is filled with you doing that.

quote:
Is it a moral victory of some kind for you if you can believe any of the businesses that were annexed did not initiate the contact with the city? Are you that desperate now?

Huh? I think this is funny because of the "outrage" shown this very morning. I don't even care that Kip lied. That's not the point at all. The hypocrisy of you and Mickey is what's funny.

I'll go even further. Kip was smart to approach the MOL and others. If St. George leaders had been successful in that attempt, it could have changed the entire landscape.

2 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board