Started By
Message

re: What will Detroit do with Greg Monroe?

Posted on 4/29/14 at 8:03 am to
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61680 posts
Posted on 4/29/14 at 8:03 am to
quote:

Yall are sleeping on Enes Kanter.


Someone mentioned him the other day. I looked at his stats and he did seem like a less proven version of Monroe, ie decent rebounding, offensive big. Neither Monroe or Kanter are good defenders, but they have the size to save some of the wear and tear on AD, and one of Monty's concerns/wishes in his exit interview was a center that was good enough on offense to let AD be guarded by the opposing PF rather than C.

I wonder if Utah would have any interest in Gordon. They'll have a TON of cap space, well below the salary floor even if they max out Hayward. Maybe Gordon, Babbit and our 2015 1st for Kanter? I was willing to give up that pick to move Gordon, if you could do it to move Gordon and get your 3rd big...
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15322 posts
Posted on 4/29/14 at 8:25 am to
quote:

I wonder if Utah would have any interest in Gordon. They'll have a TON of cap space, well below the salary floor even if they max out Hayward. Maybe Gordon, Babbit and our 2015 1st for Kanter? I was willing to give up that pick to move Gordon, if you could do it to move Gordon and get your 3rd big...



I hate giving up consecutive firsts, but I wouldn't be upset with that trade.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 4/29/14 at 9:43 am to
quote:

one of Monty's concerns/wishes in his exit interview was a center that was good enough on offense to let AD be guarded by the opposing PF rather than C


Um, why do they want only pfs guarding Davis? Davis is skill and speed right now. How many centers can contain him from 15-18ft with his shot and dribble game? Or run with him down the court?

Monty never ceases to amaze me in his rigid positionality approach.

quote:

Utah would have any interest in Gordon


That's the catch. They know Hayward is not a number 1 option. Maybe they think Gordon gives them another creator to go with Burke? Burke, Gordon, Hayward, Burks is a nice 4 man perimeter core.
Posted by Spitting Venom
Member since Sep 2013
1110 posts
Posted on 4/29/14 at 9:53 am to
quote:

They'll have a TON of cap space, well below the salary floor even if they max out Hayward

They're sitting in a pretty good situation. If they max Gordon and get the first pick in the draft, they will still have over $20 million in cap space. Roughly $22 million of space with a $15/year for Hayward and $5.5/year for 1st overall pick. Swapping Gordon + 1st for Kanter would still leave them with $13 million in space, and their roster would look pretty good.

Guards: Burke, Burks, Gordon
Forwards: Hayward, Parker/Wiggins, Evans
Big Guys: Favors, Gobert
Space: Upwards of $10 million
Picks (ETA): Two 1st round picks in 2014, 2015, 2017

Would be a pretty solid roster IMO.
This post was edited on 4/29/14 at 9:57 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram