- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pot is bad for you
Posted on 4/16/14 at 8:32 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 4/16/14 at 8:32 pm to OMLandshark
Well, 20 isn't awful, but 30 would have been much better. Also, a longitudinal study would be needed to draw any causal conclusions. Media outlets will have a field day with this, though. I'm sure Nancy Grace is foaming at her fat, stupid mouth.
This post was edited on 4/16/14 at 8:33 pm
1
Posted on 4/16/14 at 8:43 pm to rbWarEagle
quote:
Well, 20 isn't awful, but 30 would have been much better. Also, a longitudinal study would be needed to draw any causal conclusions. Media outlets will have a field day with this, though. I'm sure Nancy Grace is foaming at her fat, stupid mouth.
I work for a pharma company, and any study I use has thousands of participants. If you went to the FDA with a 40 person study, they'd laugh you out of the room.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News