Started By
Message

re: regulators mount up militias to take on LBM in nevada.

Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:44 pm to
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Westerners aren't always the most trusting of big government.


Trusting or not, a bunch of desert cowboys are smart enough to know they dont have a fighting chance.
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
45920 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:45 pm to
Breaking: Sen. Harry Reid Behind BLM Land Grab of Bundy Ranch

quote:

The Bureau of Land Management, whose director was Sen. Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) former senior adviser, has purged documents from its web site stating that the agency wants Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s cattle off of the land his family has worked for over 140 years in order to make way for solar panel power stations.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
24515 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Im pretty sure he said he would pay the state the money, just wouldnt pay the feds.


I read that the other day. For a couple of years the guy sent checks to the county or local state officials who repeatedly told him that they were not the proper party to send the fees to, and they kept returning his checks with instructions to send them to BLM. The rancher refused to pay the grazing fees to BLM. Finally, after years of this guy running his herd on federal land without paying the fee, the BLM told him to get off and stop squatting. He refused so BLM started taking possession of cattle found grazing on federal land without rights to be there.

Now people want to arm themselves to fight the government which owns the land, on the side of a rancher who is basically squatting with his herd? People are nuts.

The way I understand it, this guy could still legally run his cattle on federal land but he refuses to do it legally.

Rancher is going to lose. Any militia who show up and take shots at government agents will go to prison.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42832 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:46 pm to
Does he own the property or not? Because if he doesn't, he needs to GTFO.
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
14931 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:46 pm to
Follow the money, oil that is..

Any oil guys know what all of the colored triangles, circles, and squares are?


quote:

Here's the map showing the oil exploration conducted on the land where Bundy runs his cattle (all the red crosshairs are oil and gas exploration drilling operations):




quote:


It is customary for the U.S. government to bring armed soldiers to an oil dispute. Heavily armed snipers, helicopters and militarized soldiers have never been invoked over tortoises.



Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Sen. Harry Reid


He also had BLM redraw tortoise habitat so he could have a road put in.

Big Govt is a snake, no doubt about that.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
84265 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Does he own the property or not? Because if he doesn't, he needs to GTFO.


He does not. His family once owned the grazing rights though. And he could still own grazing rights, but he refuses to pay the fee to the feds, instead has this bizarre claim that he will only pay the state of Nevada for the grazing rights.
Posted by SaDaTayMoses
Member since Oct 2005
4367 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:48 pm to
Does he own the property?
Who owns the property?
Why does he have to pay grazing rights?
When did he stop paying these fees?
Does he pay property tax on the area?
This post was edited on 4/11/14 at 3:49 pm
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
45920 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:48 pm to
From post on PT board...

quote:

According to public records, the rights to work the Bunkerville allotment were purchased by Cliven Bundy's grandfather in 1887. These rights were in turn sold to Cliven's father, and in 1972 the rights were passed onto our current Mr. Bundy.

Now pay attention. This is very important: The agreement in place also included the rights to built in water systems, fences and roads to assure the survival of their cattle, all with their own money, not with tax dollars.

BLM stopped managing the land and were not using the fees that Bundy was originally paying for the management of it and this is also part of the reason he decided to stop paying the fees.

So BLM violated their side of the agreement with this rancher who filed complaints that they were not doing their jobs. Like most responsible people, he said "frick them" and did things himself. He improved the land and paid his taxes (not the grazing fees since BLM failed to meet their obligation).
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
84265 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

It is customary for the U.S. government to bring armed soldiers to an oil dispute. Heavily armed snipers, helicopters and militarized soldiers have never been invoked over tortoises.


That doesn't make any sense. Got to any ranch in Texas and their are oil rigs/pads all over the place with cows all over the place freely grazing.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

not his land


the grazing rights are...

quote:

has been using federal land


it was legally his grazing rights before the feds "claimed" it....
This post was edited on 4/11/14 at 3:52 pm
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

His family once owned the grazing rights though. And he could still own grazing rights, but he refuses to pay the fee to the feds,


legally the feds have never had control of the grazing rights. The state does...
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
84265 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

The agreement in place also included the rights to built in water systems, fences and roads to assure the survival of their cattle, all with their own money, not with tax dollars.


Whose money? Bundy's?

Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
14931 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:52 pm to
Nevadan Named BLM Chief
quote:

CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) — (Neil Kornze) named director of the Bureau of Land Management.

Kornze .... is a former senior adviser to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.



Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
84265 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

the grazing rights are...


does he not lose those rights when he stops paying the agreed upon fee?
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:54 pm to
Stolen from poli board



Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42832 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 3:56 pm to
First mistake was getting involved with the Gov. He's in a no win situation.

ETA:

Bottom line, it's gov property. If they see another need for the property you are using, your contract is a moot point.
This post was edited on 4/11/14 at 3:58 pm
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
21770 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:00 pm to
So, some dude watches a lot of Fox News, and therefore refuses to send his check to the right address. The government doesn't get paid and takes his cows, and this is some kind of big government plot to take his land? I'm pretty sure if I mail my truck payment to Krispy Kreme because I don't like the credit union they'll come take my truck and you'll all call me a fricking retard.
Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:01 pm to
BLM stopped allowing grazing in that area due to the tortoise, but Bundy has continued grazing in spite of it. Even if he would have paid, it wouldn't have mattered because the grazing is outlawed.

On a side note. I think wildlife research and protection is necessary, but often times the wildlife guys go way off the deep-end to protect things that on their way out anyway even with human intervention.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
266069 posts
Posted on 4/11/14 at 4:04 pm to
quote:


does he not lose those rights when he stops paying the agreed upon fee?



It's my understanding he stopped paying when the Fed changed the rules. It's basically his idea that the feds are trying to run all the ranchers off, and he may have a good point.

quote:

The bureau does allow grazing on federal lands -- it administers 18,000 grazing permits and leases on 157 million acres across the country, the agency said.
Bundy's dispute with the government began about 1993 when the bureau changed grazing rules for the 600,000-acre Gold Butte area to protect an endangered desert tortoise, KLAS reported.
Bundy refused to abide by the changes and stopped paying his grazing fees to the federal bureau, which he contends is infringing on state rights. His family has been ranching since the 1800s, before the U.S. Department of Interior was created and endangered species became a federal issue, he said in an interview with KLAS.


LINK

He's fighting a losing battle though, the feds are just too powerful.
This post was edited on 4/11/14 at 4:05 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram