Interesting.
So Obamacare required your insurance provider to cover extra services, eliminate preexisting exclusions, etc. and your rate went down?

If true, that should rate right up there with Our Lady of Fátima as a modern miracle.
Count me as dubious.

Only way those numbers could work is if you were highrisk/old and are benefitting from 3:1 Obamacare caps placed on highest to lowest risk cost ratio. Meaning the young healthy folks here are paying part of your premium.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by La Place Mike

West Florida Republic

Member since Jan 2004

28907 posts

Posted on 4/10/14 at 8:13 am to NC_Tigah

quote:
Interesting.
So Obamacare required your insurance provider to cover extra services, eliminate preexisting exclusions, etc. and your rate went down?

If true, that should rate right up there with Our Lady of Fátima as a modern miracle.
Count me as dubious.

Only way those numbers could work is if you were highrisk/old and are benefitting from 3:1 Obamacare caps placed on highest to lowest risk cost ratio. Meaning the young healthy folks here are paying part of your premium.

This.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by 90proofprofessional

Member since Mar 2004

24445 posts

Posted on 4/10/14 at 1:05 pm to NC_Tigah

quote:
Only way those numbers could work is if you were highrisk/old and are benefitting from 3:1 Obamacare caps placed on highest to lowest risk cost ratio. Meaning the young healthy folks here are paying part of your premium.

since that poster is pretty much the only one to experience such an unconditional improvement, it would definitely be helpful to know why his situation was so bad before

(fwiw, my coverage/deductible/premium hasn't changed. it was already employer-sponsored, family, generous, and expensive. i haven't bothered comparing with the exchange plans)

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board