Started By
Message

re: What is the Money Board's opinion on high frequency trading?

Posted on 4/2/14 at 10:16 pm to
Posted by reb13
Member since May 2010
10905 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Who are these HFT's? Are there any company names? Isn't it kind of a form of insider trading?


Goldman Sachs was one of the very first in 2009 I think?
Posted by Chris Farley
Regulating
Member since Sep 2009
4180 posts
Posted on 4/2/14 at 10:56 pm to
These firms are using available resources to obtain public data milliseconds before others and profit on it. I'm not sure that you can call it front running or not, and it's definitely not insider trading. Like most arbitrage opportunities, the market has caught up and HFT firms are executing less trades and making less profit than they were a few years ago.

On the outside, and without using all of the sensationalizing terms(rigging), this is American capitalism at its finest. I think the real question is whether or not this causes unnecessary volatility in the market. There are some places that HFT arbitrage has a place, like stocks that trade in multiple countries keeping their prices in line, but I can't honestly say I know enough about the current HFT trading procedures and regulations to agree or disagree on the volatility debate.
Posted by Mootsman
Charlotte, NC
Member since Oct 2012
6025 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 3:03 pm to
quote:


Goldman Sachs was one of the very first in 2009 I think?


They did a segment on Michael Lewis's new book on 60 minutes. The guy for RBC that uncovered the HFT's game said Goldman endorses getting rid of HFT. If so it's only because it's hurting their P&L.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram