- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Many food and agricultural varieties going "extinct"?
Posted on 4/1/14 at 7:10 pm to Zach
Posted on 4/1/14 at 7:10 pm to Zach
quote:
BTW, Indians didn't plant corn in rows.
Neither do the farmers in the Midwest/ corn belt. Only the farmers down here and only because of furrow irrigation. Up there it's all planted flat.
Posted on 4/2/14 at 9:41 am to LSUballs
The notion that we've outgrown our ability to produce quality food is simply false. I can go on and on, but I'll only attempt to make a few points.
1.) Only 2-3% of US farmland is growing fruits and vegetables; and about 60% is growing commodity crops. Much of the later is animal feed, which is a poor substitute for ruminants. It would be more efficient to simply let grazing animals graze, instead of using a ton of synthetic nitrogen to fertilize commodity crops and then shipping them to feed lots.
2.) Quality farmland and pasture is being used, increasingly, to build Mcmansions.
3.) Who even attempts to grown food anymore? Sadly few people. Instead, people obsess over lawns and flower beds. If the average household just planted some lettuce, etc think of how far we could stretch the food supply. As recent as WW2 a great deal of produce was produced in home/community gardens. Now we have huge sections of quality land producing nothing. This was once considered a sin in America, akin to draft-dodging.
There are a ton of options to produce enough quality food. But when we accept the premise that we are supposed to rely on mass agriculture produced 1000's of miles away, we create our own fate.
Rant ended. TLDR.
1.) Only 2-3% of US farmland is growing fruits and vegetables; and about 60% is growing commodity crops. Much of the later is animal feed, which is a poor substitute for ruminants. It would be more efficient to simply let grazing animals graze, instead of using a ton of synthetic nitrogen to fertilize commodity crops and then shipping them to feed lots.
2.) Quality farmland and pasture is being used, increasingly, to build Mcmansions.
3.) Who even attempts to grown food anymore? Sadly few people. Instead, people obsess over lawns and flower beds. If the average household just planted some lettuce, etc think of how far we could stretch the food supply. As recent as WW2 a great deal of produce was produced in home/community gardens. Now we have huge sections of quality land producing nothing. This was once considered a sin in America, akin to draft-dodging.
There are a ton of options to produce enough quality food. But when we accept the premise that we are supposed to rely on mass agriculture produced 1000's of miles away, we create our own fate.
Rant ended. TLDR.
Posted on 4/2/14 at 11:29 am to LSUballs
quote:
Neither do the farmers in the Midwest/ corn belt. Only the farmers down here and only because of furrow irrigation. Up there it's all planted flat.
I didn't know that. Does anyone know if corn from a garden tastes better than corn from a grocery (like the difference with tomatoes)? I've never had corn right from the field.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)