- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Decline of the African American family - article
Posted on 3/30/14 at 11:55 am to Palmetto08
Posted on 3/30/14 at 11:55 am to Palmetto08
The problem with the way this is discussed is in your pulled quote.
Yet when you impose "help" by threat of punishment (taking benefits, subsidies, etc away) you have a direct, adverse affect on those same children.
If that cannot be understood first, the conversation cannot take place.
quote:
if we are ever to focus on children who, for no fault of their own
Yet when you impose "help" by threat of punishment (taking benefits, subsidies, etc away) you have a direct, adverse affect on those same children.
If that cannot be understood first, the conversation cannot take place.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 11:58 am to recruitnik
quote:
Yet when you impose "help" by threat of punishment (taking benefits, subsidies, etc away) you have a direct, adverse affect on those same children.
So, you're assumption is that these people are incapable of earning a decent wage on their own through cognitive or physical limitations?
The system is built to be a poverty trap. It's a widely accepted social term. The solution to poverty isn't through entitlements, which creates the trap. It's through investment that creates employment.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 12:00 pm to recruitnik
quote:
you have a direct, adverse affect on those same children.
Cap the # of kids the taxpayers support at 3 and you would see some people at least attempting to be more responsible. Since most of these "dads" aren't pulling their weight in society and living off the government tit also how about we cut their subsidies and give it to the kid then the drain on the public is a net 0.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 3:32 pm to recruitnik
quote:
Yet when you impose "help" by threat of punishment (taking benefits, subsidies, etc away) you have a direct, adverse affect on those same children.
If that cannot be understood first, the conversation cannot take place.
And this is exactly the point in the conversation that will never allow this problem to be solved.
Tell us about all of the good we are doing to the children under the present system.
And then act like if the government didn't subsidize their irresponsible behavior and unhealthy lifestyles then they and their children would all starve to death and have to live on the street or under the bridge because that's what 100 years of indoctrination of statism has done to the people of this country. No one can imagine a solution without it going through the government. That's the mental disorder most people have.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News