- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Serious question/hypothetical for you legal eagle types
Posted on 2/27/14 at 3:17 pm to Antonio Moss
Posted on 2/27/14 at 3:17 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
In fact, this bill in AZ has been so egregiously misrepresented by the media that 99.9% of people don't realize that it is nothing more than a clarification on AZ's version of Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) - a federal statute which permits those accused of breaking the law with a "religious practice" defense.
It was redundant and unnecessary, but the clear intent and message expressed by all of its supporters was that it was specifically targeting gays and that's what I find objectionable and I think created the firestorm.
1
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:43 pm to cwill
so the NM Elaine Photography, LLC outcome could not happen in an Arizona city such as Phoenix that in fact does have anti-discrimination laws that apply to sexual orientation? that's what this RFRA amendment was about.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News